Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ram Babu SahniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court granted permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, dismissing it as withdrawn.

Summary

Ram Babu Sahni filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether it could allow the withdrawal of an anticipatory bail petition. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh granted the request, permitting the withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court may permit the withdrawal of an anticipatory bail application

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68020 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2025 Thana- GADHA District- Sitamarhi
                  ======================================================
                  Ram Babu Sahni S/O Sugdev Sahni Resident of Villlage- Bhale Premnagar,
                  P.S.- Garha, Dist.- Sitamarhi

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner      :        Mr. Dwij Raj, Advocate
                  For the State           :        Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP
                  For the Informant       :        Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    13-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                    petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and

                    learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

                                 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf

                    of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory

                    bail application.

                                 3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application

                    stands dismissed as withdrawn.



                                          (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.