Patna High Court
Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond and sureties.
Summary
Ankit Kumar was arrested for the alleged killing of his wife, charged under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, and has been in custody since 1 March 2025. He contended that the FIR was filed under Section 80(2) while the charge‑sheet was framed under Section 108 of the BNS, and that the deceased had actually committed suicide, a fact recorded in the case diary. The State opposed his bail application. The Patna High Court, after hearing counsel, allowed the bail application, directing his release on a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and a condition to cooperate with the trial. The court clarified that the order is confined to bail and does not prejudice the merits of the criminal case.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted when the FIR is under Section 80(2) of the BNS but the charge‑sheet is under Section 108 of the BNS
- Whether the claim of suicide as the cause of death affects the grant of bail
- Whether the petitioner poses a risk of fleeing or tampering with evidence
Legislation cited
- BNS — s. 108, 3(5), 80(2)
Subjects
- bail
- homicide
- suicide claim
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Section 108
- Section 80(2)
- Section 3(5)
- Patna High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68091 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2025 Thana- KAJI MUHAMMADPUR District-
Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Ankit Kumar S/O Ashok Chaudhary R/O Village- Chhapra, P.S.- Kanti, Dist.-
Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashutosh Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umesh Lal Verma
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
9 09-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Kazi Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 61 of 2025 registered for the
offence under Sections 80(2), 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner, who
is the husband of the deceased, is said to have killed his wife.
4. The petitioner is in custody since 1.3.2025.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
though the FIR was registered under Section 80(2) of the BNS
but the charge-sheet has been submitted under Section 108 of
the BNS. He further submits that the deceased has committed
suicide and this fact has come in the case diary which is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68091 of 2025(9) dt.09-04-2026
2/3
apparent from the description of the place of occurrence. The
dead body was also taken out after breaking open the door of the
room in which the body was found hanging. He also submits
that the the trial is progressing.
6. Learned APP for the State has opposed the
application of the petitioner.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application
is allowed.
8. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on
bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
the learned concerned Court below in connection with Kazi
Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 61 of 2025.
9. As a condition of this order, the petitioner, after
being released on bail, is directed to co-operate in the trial either
by appearing personally or through his lawyer in the trial Court
on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Non-compliance
of the condition will result in cancellation of the bail bonds of
the petitioner.
10. It is, however, clarified that the observations
made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail
application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68091 of 2025(9) dt.09-04-2026
3/3
any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not
expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…