Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pappu PatelversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to the conditions imposed under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

Summary

Petitioners Pappu Patel and Munna Sharma sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged assaults on the informant's family. The prosecution alleged that Patel instigated an assault on Bittu Rai, who then injured Muniya Devi, while Sharma assaulted the informant with a lathi, resulting in simple injuries. The petitioners contended that the allegations were exaggerated and that they have no prior criminal record. The State opposed bail, noting the existence of injuries, albeit simple. Considering the lack of antecedent, the nature of injuries, and the petitioners' cooperation, the Court exercised its power under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. to grant anticipatory bail with stringent conditions, including surety, regular court appearances, and non‑interference with witnesses.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in view of the alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the nature of injuries and the petitioners' clean criminal record justify the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 Cr.P.C.
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • assault
  • simple injury
  • criminal antecedent
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68355 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2025 Thana- SIDHWALIYA District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
           1.     Pappu Patel S/o- Vashishth Patel Resident of village - Bucheya Jairam Das
                  Ke Tola, P.S. Sidhwalia, District - Gopalganj
           2.     Munna Sharma S/o- Shiv Ji Sharma Resident of village - Bucheya Jairam
                  Das Ke Tola, P.S. Sidhwalia, District - Gopalganj
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar                           ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   11-02-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in

                   connection with Sidhwaliya P.S. Case No. 31 of 2025 for an

                   offence u/s 329 (3), 126 (2), 115 (2), 109, 324 (4), 352, 351 (2),

                   3 (5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 lodged on 06.02.2025 by

                   the informant, Birendra Sharma.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, on the small issue of

                   playing vulgar sons and opposition to it, the allegation of attack

                   is there against the accused persons.

                                4. It is alleged that Pappu Patel gave Farsa to Bittu

                   Rai who gave the said blow to Muniya Devi, the wife of the

                   informant. Ravi Rai assaulted the pregnant daughter-in-law of

                   the informant while Munna Sharma assaulted the informant by

                   ‘lathi’. They were shifted to Sadar Hospital and then the FIR.

                                5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that only
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68355 of 2025(4) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/3




          to exaggerate, the allegations have been made. The injuries have

          been found to be simple in nature.

                       6. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that

          though simple injuries are there.

                       7. Considering the submissions of the parties as also

          that the petitioners do not have criminal antecedent, the injuries

          have been found to be simple in nature, in that background, this

          Court is inclined to extend them the privilege of anticipatory

          bail.

                       7. Let the petitioners be released on bail, in the event

          of their arrest or surrender before the concerned court within a

          period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties

          of the like amount each in connection with Sidhwaliya P.S. Case

          No. 31 of 2025 to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-

          1st Class, Gopalganj subject to the conditions as laid down

          under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also the other conditions.

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioners who shall provide official

          document (Aadhar Card/Driving License/Voter ID/Pan Card

          etc.) to show his/her bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioners shall appear on each and every date
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68355 of 2025(4) dt.11-02-2026
                                                         3/3




                       before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

                       dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their

                       bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                    (iii) the petitioners shall appear before the concerned

                       police station every fortnight for next six months to mark their

                       attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted

                       before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be at liberty

                       to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds;

                                    (iv) the petitioners shall in no way try to induce or

                       promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                       failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                       cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                    (v) the petitioners shall desist from committing any

                       criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                       to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.



                                                      (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.