Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Jabbar @ Md. ZabbarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

In view of the lack of material evidence linking the petitioners to the alleged offences and the victim’s statement not naming them, bail was granted subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC/Section 482(2) BNSS.

Summary

The High Court heard bail applications of Md. Abbas and Md. Jabbar, accused in a police‑station case involving alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The FIR was based on a police officer’s statement that a girl had been forced into flesh‑trade, and the petitioners' names appeared in the FIR, but the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS did not name them and no girl or illicit material was recovered from their premises. The State opposed bail, while the petitioners argued the lack of direct evidence and independent witnesses. Considering the absence of material linking the petitioners to the crime, the court granted bail with a bond of Rs 10,000 each, two sureties, and conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC/Section 482(2) BNSS, including a family member as bailor and cooperation with the investigation. The order was pronounced by Justice Soni Shrivastava.

Issues considered

  • The adequacy of evidence linking the petitioners to the alleged flesh‑trade offences under BNSS and ITPA for the purpose of bail.
  • Whether the absence of the petitioners' names in the victim's statement and lack of recovered material justify granting bail.
  • The applicability of Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) BNSS in granting bail in such offences.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • immoral traffic
  • BNSS
  • FIR
  • evidence
  • section 438
  • section 482
  • conditions of bail
  • forcible flesh trade

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69182 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2025 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Abbas S/o- Dular Khalifa Resident of village- Rampur north Police
                 station- Forbesganj District-Araria

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                                          WITH
                         CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 68454 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2025 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Jabbar @ Md. Zabbar Son of Dhotar Khalifa Resident of village -
                 Referral Road, Ward No.- 03, P.S.- Forbesganj, Dist.- Araria

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 69182 of 2025)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 68454 of 2025)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhura Nand Jha
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   21-01-2026            As both these bail applications arise out of the same

                   police station case number, hence, with consent of parties, they

                   are being heard together and disposed of by this common order.

                   2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P.

                   for the State.

                   3. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69182 of 2025(5) dt.21-01-2026
                                            2/4




          the offences punishable under Sections 111, 98, 99, 70 (1), 115

          (2), 109, 124 (1), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4/5/6 of the

          Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956.

          4. The allegation in the first information report is based on the

          statement of S.H.O. that a girl had been subjected to forcible

          flesh trade by the accused persons including the present

          petitioners.

          5. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that it

          would be apparent from the first information report itself that

          the victim girl who was recovered by the police personnel

          during the course of patrolling, stated that she had been sold

          and confined at certain places and the police raided the place. It

          is further submitted that the police got information from the

          brother of the victim who informed the police with regard to

          whereabouts of the victim girl, whereafter a raid was conducted

          at the house of one Fuchka and the girl was recovered from the

          said place. However, the names of the petitioners have figured

          in the First Information Report generally among the persons

          who are involved in flesh trade. It is further submitted that

          upon such information, a raid was conducted at the house of

          the petitioners also, however neither any girl was recovered nor

          any objectionable material/article was recovered and, that too,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69182 of 2025(5) dt.21-01-2026
                                            3/4




          was done in absence of any independent witnesses. Further, it

          would also appear from the statement of the victim girl

          recorded under Section 183 BNSS that the names of the

          petitioners does not figure in her statement, although she has

          supported the allegation that she was being subjected to flesh

          trade.

          6.   Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

          7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the

          case and also considering the fact that the names of the

          petitioners has not been disclosed in the statement of the victim

          recorded under Section 183 BNSS, coupled with the fact that

          neither any girl nor any objectionable material was recovered

          from the house of the petitioners,                   let the above named

          petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or

          surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four

          weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-

          (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where

          the case is pending/successor Court in connection with

          Forbesganj P.S. Case No.218 of 2025, subject to the condition as

          laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C/482 (2) of the

          Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, subject to
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69182 of 2025(5) dt.21-01-2026
                                                        4/4




                      further conditions that

                      (i) One of the bailors would be the family member/close relative

                      of the petitioners.

                      (ii) The petitioners would make themselves available before the

                      Investigating Officer as and when required and in case of non-

                      cooperation in the investigation/trial, the prosecution would be

                      at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail bonds of

                      the petitioners.


                                                (Soni Shrivastava, J)

Trivedi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.