Patna High Court

Lakshman Yadav @ Lakshman ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 5 January 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Bench: SONI SHRIVASTAVA

Holding

The application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Lakshman Yadav filed an application in the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding arising from a 2019 case. The State of Bihar and Dhananjay Yadav were opposite parties. After hearing arguments from counsel for the petitioner, the State and the second opposite party, the petitioner’s counsel requested that the application be withdrawn. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn. The judge also directed that the parties cooperate in the trial and warned that any further non‑cooperation could invite appropriate legal action.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner's application should be dismissed on withdrawal

Subjects

withdrawal of application
court order
criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69597 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2019 Thana- HUSSAINGANJ District- Siwan
                  ======================================================
                  Lakshman Yadav @ Lakshman Chaudhari S/O Late Bhgawan Chaudhari
                  Resident of Village- Chhapia Bujurg, P.S.- Hussainganj, Dist.- Siwan
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
             1.    The State of Bihar
             2.    Dhananjay Yadav S/O Bindeswari Yadav Resident of Village- Chhapia
                   Bujurg, P.S.- Hussainganj, Dist.- Siwan
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    05-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP

                    for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

                                 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                    petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present application.

                                 3. Prayer is allowed.

                                 4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.

                                 5. However, it is expected that the opposite parties

                    would cooperate in the trial and in case of any further non-

                    cooperation, the learned court concerned would always be at

                    liberty to take steps in accordance with law.



                                               (Soni Shrivastava, J)
devendra/-
U      T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…