Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vipul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Vipul Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act, alleging that only 10 litres of cough syrup were recovered from his car and that he is innocent. The prosecution argued that the seizure linked him to the offence and highlighted his four prior criminal cases. The petitioner contended that the major seizure of 435 litres was from a co‑accused, Ajit Kumar, who had already been granted bail, and that he had been in judicial custody since 8 July 2025. The State opposed bail on the ground of his antecedents. After hearing both sides, the Court found the petitioner's case to be on a better footing and ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the satisfaction of the Excise Judge.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite prior criminal antecedents
  • Whether ownership of the vehicle from which a small quantity of cough syrup was recovered suffices to justify continued detention
  • Whether the presence of a co‑accused with a larger seizure impacts the bail decision

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • excise law
  • prohibition act
  • prior convictions
  • vehicle ownership
  • cough syrup seizure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69952 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2025 Thana- BANGAWON District- Saharsa
                 ======================================================
                 Vipul Kumar S/o Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Yadav R/o Village- Baijnathpatti,
                 Ward No. 04, P.S.- Saharsa Sadar, Dist.- Saharsa

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   09-01-2026                   Heard Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and Mr. Rabindra Kumar, learned APP for the

                   State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Bangaon P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar

                   Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution in short that from a

                   Baleno car, altogether 10 liters of Wiscof Cough Syrup were

                   recovered. Petitioner is the owner of the said car.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this case,
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69952 of 2025(5) dt.09-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     from the possession of one co-accused, namely Ajit Kumar,

                     altogether 435 liters of cough syrup was recovered and he has

                     already been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 63116

                     of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on better footing. He

                     further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial

                     custody since 08.07.2025.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal

                     antecedent of four cases.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Exclusive Special (Excise) Judge-II, Saharsa in connection with

                     Bangaon P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.