Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jugal Yadav @ Jugal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application, dismissing it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Jugal Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. No further orders were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn by the petitioner

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70198 of 2025
                            Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2024 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya
                  ======================================================
                  Jugal Yadav @ Jugal Kumar S/o Ramchandra Yadav @ Ramchandra Prasad
                  R/o Village- Kewati, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner       :        Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate
                  For the State            :        Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                        ORAL ORDER

5    02-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                    petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

                                 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf

                    of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory

                    bail application.

                                 3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application

                    stands dismissed as withdrawn.



                                           (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.