Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

SHASHIRAS SINGH @ SHASHIRAS @ SHASHIRAJ SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to bail bond, sureties, and a maintenance condition.

Summary

The petitioner, Shashiras Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Section 498-A IPC and Section 3 Dowry Prohibition Act) alleging assault for dowry demand. He claimed innocence and alleged false implication, while the State opposed the bail. Relying on the Supreme Court's guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, the High Court allowed the anticipatory bail application. The bail was conditioned on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, compliance with Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482 CrPC, and a monthly maintenance payment of Rs.20,000 to the informant, failure of which would lead to bail cancellation. The order is subject to any future maintenance proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC despite serious allegations under 498-A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act.
  • Whether imposing a maintenance payment as a condition of bail is permissible.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • dowry harassment
  • Section 498-A IPC
  • maintenance order
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70493 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2025 Thana- CHAND District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
                 ======================================================
                 SHASHIRAS SINGH @ SHASHIRAS @ SHASHIRAJ SINGH S/O
                 SANTOSH SINGH R/O VILL.- MALHAUNA, P.S.- BOSDIH, DIST.-
                 BALLIA, PRESENTLY R/O VILLAGE- INDIA RAM MANDIR COLONY ,
                 P.S. OBRA , DISTRICT ROBERTSGANJ, U.P.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    THE STATE OF BIHAR PATNA
           2.    SWECHHA SINGH W/O SHASHIRAJ SINGH, D/O JITENDRA PRATAP
                 SINGH R/O VILL.- KILNI, P.S.- CHAND, DIST.- KAIMUR

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   09-03-2026                       Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   counsel for the Informant and learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Chand P.S. Case No. 16 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   under Section         498-A of the Indian Penal Code and under

                   section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is

                   accused of assaulting and torturing the victim for demand of

                   dowry.

                                   4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for

                   the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

                   been implicated in this case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70493 of 2025(3) dt.09-03-2026
                                            2/3




                          5. Learned counsel for the State and learned

          counsel for the informant has opposed the application of the

          petitioner.

                          6. Considering the aforesaid facts along with the

          submission of the parties and in view of the law laid down by

          the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs.

          State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273, this application of

          grant of anticipatory bail is allowed.

                          7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of

          his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within

          six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

          Magistrate, 1st Class, Kaimur at Bhabhua/concerned Court

          below in connection with Chand P.S. Case No. 16 of 2025,

          subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the

          Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.

                          8. As a condition of this order, the petitioner is

          directed to pay a maintenance amount of Rs. 20,000/- from the

          month of March, 2026 to the informant and the maintenance for

          the month of March, 2026 shall be paid to the informant within

          ten days of pronouncement of this order and thereafter the
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70493 of 2025(3) dt.09-03-2026
                                                      3/3




                    maintenance amount from the month of April, 2026 shall be

                    paid to the informant every month before the 10 th day of the

                    month and if the petitioner fails to pay the maintenance amount

                    to the opposite party no. 02 then his bail bonds shall be

                    cancelled by the Court below.

                                    9. It is made clear that the aforesaid maintenance

                    order will be subject to the outcome of any order of concerned

                    Court below passed in maintenance proceedings, if any.



                                                              (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.