Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md Ali Akhtar @ Ali AkhtarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner with a bail bond and a condition to deposit Rs.5,000 per month in the complainant’s bank account.

Summary

The petitioner, Md Ali Akhtar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal trial (Trial No. 4684 of 2025) arising from a dowry harassment complaint (Complaint C-290 of 2024) alleging cruelty, assault and dowry demands under various sections of the B.N.S. and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that after the marriage, the petitioner and co‑accused demanded a motorcycle, washing machine and Rs.3,00,000 as dowry, and upon non‑payment, subjected the complainant to cruelty, attempted burning and eventual assault and eviction from the matrimonial home. The petitioner contended he had committed no offence and offered to pay Rs.5,000 per month to the complainant to maintain family harmony. The complainant accepted this offer. The Court, after hearing both sides, exercised its inherent powers under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. and granted anticipatory bail, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and the condition that the petitioner deposit Rs.5,000 monthly in the complainant’s bank account.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. despite serious allegations under the Dowry Prohibition Act and other criminal provisions.
  • Whether the Court may impose a condition of monthly monetary payment to the complainant as part of the bail order.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • dowry harassment
  • cruelty
  • Section 482
  • bail conditions
  • family dispute
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71223 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2024 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE - SIKRAHANA
                                                 District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Md Ali Akhtar @ Ali Akhtar S/o Kifayat Miyan Resident of village -
                 Bikrampur, P.S- Dhaka, District- East champaran
                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     Shahnaz Khatoon W/O Md. Ali Akhtar, D/O Molajim Resident of village -
                  Serawna, P.S- Dhaka, District- East champaran
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :      Mr. Brajesh Sahay, Avocate
                                                Mr. Shahid Jawed, Advocate
                                                Mr. Rananjay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Informant       :      Mr. Vinod Kumar Seth, Advocate
                 For the State           :      Mr. Kanhiya Kishor, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   09-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned.

                                 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Trial No. 4684 of 2025, arising out of Complaint Case No. (C-

                   290) of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections

                   86, 118(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109 of B.N.S. and ¾ of Dowry

                   Prohibition Act, wherein learned Magistrate took cognizance under

                   Sections 85, 115(2) and 126(2) of B.N.S. and ¾ of Dowry

                   Prohibition Act.

                                 3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the marriage of

                   the complainant was solemnized with petitioner on 14.04.2021 as

                   per Muslim rites and rituals. After the marriage, all the accused

                   persons started demanding motorcycle, washing machine, and Rs.

                   3,00,000 (three lakh) as dowry. Due to non-fulfillment of the said

                   demand, accused persons started committing cruelty and torture
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71223 of 2025(4) dt.09-04-2026
                                            2/3




          with the complainant and even attempted to burn her. Despite

          efforts by her parents to resolve the matter, the situation did not

          improve. Finally, on 27.06.2024, the accused persons assaulted her

          and ousted her from her matrimonial home.

                       4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner alleged and

          he has falsely been implicated in this case. However, without

          prejudice to the right and contention of the petitioner, and in order

          to maintain harmony in the family, the petitioner is ready and

          willing to pay a sum of Rs. 5,000/- per month to the Opposite Party

          No. 2 as living cost, subject to the final outcome of the present case

          as well as the matrimonial case, if any, pending and/or decided

          between the parties.

                       5. Learned Counsel for the complainant-Opposite Party

          No. 2 accepts the offer so made by learned Counsel for the

          petitioner and submits that O.P. No. 2 is at the verge of starvation

          and the petitioner may be directed to deposit the said amount of Rs.

          5,000/- per month in the bank account of the complainant-Opposite

          Party No. 2, details of which shall be furnished by learned Counsel

          for the Opposite Party No. 2 to learned Counsel for the petitioner

          within ten days from today.

                       6. After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and

          taking into consideration the materials on record and the fact that
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71223 of 2025(4) dt.09-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     the offer made by learned Counsel for the petitioner has been

                     accepted by learned Counsel for the Opposite Party No. 2, I am

                     inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail.

                                  7. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

                                  8. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his

                     arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of

                     six weeks from today, be released on bail, upon furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                     amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial

                     Magistrate, Sikrahana at Dhaka, East Champaran at Motihari, in

                     connection with Trial No. 4684 of 2024, arising out of Complaint

                     Case No. (C-290) of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down

                     under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following

                     condition:-

                                  (i) that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs. 5,000/-

                     per month in bank account of the Opposite Party No. 2 positively

                     by the 7th day of every month starting from 21st April, 2026.



                                              (Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
Siwani/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.