Patna High Court
Nawal Kishor @ Nabal PanjiyaraversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- REJECTED
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
Bail was denied because the serious nature of the offences, the petitioners’ delayed surrender, and their criminal antecedents outweighed any claim of false implication.
Summary
The petitioners, Anil Panjiyara and Nawal Kishor Panjiyara, were arrested in connection with a 2016 FIR (Amarpur PS Case No.357) alleging they shot the father‑in‑law of an informant, leading to his death, and were charged under several IPC sections and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They sought bail, claiming false implication and pointing to the earlier grant of bail to a co‑accused, Dilip Panjiyara, in a similar case. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the serious nature of the alleged firing, the petitioners’ late surrender in 2025, and their criminal antecedents. The Court examined the gravity of the charges, the delay caused by the petitioners’ surrender, and their prior criminal record. Concluding that the allegations were serious and the delay substantial, the Court refused to grant bail to both petitioners.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to accused persons charged with serious offences under the IPC and Arms Act despite alleged false implication.
- Whether the delay in surrender and the petitioners’ criminal antecedents justify denial of bail.
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 27
- Indian Penal Code — s. 147, 148, 149, 302, 323, 341, 506
Subjects
- bail
- IPC
- Arms Act
- delay in surrender
- criminal antecedents
- false implication
- shooting
- murder
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69702 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-357 Year-2016 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka
======================================================
Anil Panjiyara S/o Late Mahendra Panjiyara R/o Village- Nagardih, P.S.-
Amarpur (Fullidumar), District- Banka
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 71598 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-357 Year-2016 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka
======================================================
Nawal Kishor @ Nabal Panjiyara S/o Late Mahendra Panjiyar R/o Village-
Nagar Dih, P.S.- Amarpur in the district of Banka
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 69702 of 2025)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Pravesh Nath Tiwari, Adv.
Mr.Ravi Prakash Dwivedi, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 71598 of 2025)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
4 16-02-2026 Both the cases are being heard together as they are
arising out of same P.S. Case, being Amarpur P.S. Case No.357
of 2016.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned APP for the State.
3. A prayer for bail has been made on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69702 of 2025(4) dt.16-02-2026
2/3
petitioners in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case no.357 of
2016 registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302,
506 of Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
4. Allegation in the F.I.R. is that the petitioners along
with others shot the father-in-law of the informant, causing him
to succumb to his injuries.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case on account
of pending criminal case with regard to murder of petitioner’s
father. It has also been submitted that 21 persons have been
named in the F.I.R and co-accused Dilip Panjiyara has been
granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order
dated 18.04.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 79268 of 2018 with
almost similar allegations (Annexure-P/2). The petitioner nos. 1
and 2 are in custody since 14.02.2025 and 17.05.2025
respectively and undertake to cooperate in the case/trial.
6. The application for bail is opposed by learned
A.P.P. for the State on the ground that there is a direct allegation
against the petitioners of firing upon the deceased. Since the
case is of the year 2016, the petitioners have already delayed the
proceedings by their late surrender in the year 2025.
7. Taking into consideration the rival contention of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69702 of 2025(4) dt.16-02-2026
3/3
parties and also considering the fact that there are serious
allegations of opening firing against the petitioners coupled with
the fact that enough delay has been caused on account of late
surrender of these petitioners and also they have chequered
history of criminal antecedents, this Court is not inclined to
grant bail to the petitioners and the applications are rejected.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
Harsh/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.