Patna High Court
Md. Riyashat Sah @ Md. Riyasat SahuversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to bond and surety conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Md. Riyashat Sah, was arrested in connection with a seizure of 13.20 grams of a narcotic substance, although the seized drug was found on a co-accused and the petitioner’s involvement was limited to ownership of the motorcycle used. He was charged under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act and had been in custody since 23 October 2025. The petitioner argued that he had no direct possession of the narcotics, the quantity was only of intermediate size, and he had no prior criminal record. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offence. The Court, noting the lack of direct possession, the petitioner’s clean antecedent, and the duration of pre‑trial detention, ordered that bail be granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to the condition of physical presence in court for each trial date.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to a person charged under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act when the narcotic was not recovered from his possession.
- Whether the intermediate quantity of the seized narcotic and the petitioner’s clean antecedent justify bail.
- Whether the period of pre‑trial detention warrants bail.
Legislation cited
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — s. 21(b), 8(c)
Subjects
- bail
- NDPS Act
- possession
- intermediate quantity
- clean antecedent
- sureties
- pre‑trial detention
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7207 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-532 Year-2025 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia
======================================================
Md. Riyashat Sah @ Md. Riyasat Sahu Son of Md. Jahangir Resident of
Village - Chandi Aaga Tola, Ranipatra, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Purnea
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bidhu Ranjan, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
2 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for
the offence punishable under Section 8(c) and 21 (b) of the
N.D.P.S. Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, on a tip-off the
police apprehended two persons along with a motorcycle and
seized 13.20 grams of smack. The said motorcycle is in the
name of the petitioner.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioner that from a bare reading of the F.I.R., it would be
clear that no recovery has been made from the conscious
possession of this petitioner rather it is only the motorcycle
upon which the co-accused was riding, belonged to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7207 of 2026(2) dt.10-02-2026
2/3
petitioner. Further, the recovery of 13.20 grams of smack like
substance was made from the possession of the co-accused, Md.
Habib and it was upon his disclosure the name of another co-
accused, Sabina Perween has transpired in this case from whom
some more recovery was made. It has been argued that in any
view of the matter, the quantity is of intermediate quantity little
over small and much less than commercial quantity but the
petitioner is not concerned with the alleged recovery. The
petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing
in custody since 23.10.2025.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail
petition.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and
circumstances of the case and considering the fact that no
recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner
coupled with the fact that he has clean antecedent and is in
custody since 23.10.2025, the above named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below
where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with
Purnia Sadar P.S. Case No.532 of 2025, subject to the conditions
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7207 of 2026(2) dt.10-02-2026
3/3
that the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on
each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on
two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds
shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
Trivedi/-
U T
Checking your session…