Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Mukesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Dharmendra Paswan, sought permission to withdraw the pending application. The court granted the request, stating that no opinion on the merits had been expressed. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive issues were adjudicated, and the order was purely procedural.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • procedural law
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • court order

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7241 of 2024
                           Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2023 Thana- Kalpi District- Arwal
                  ======================================================
                  Mukesh Kumar S/o Ganga Deyal Singh @ Ganga Dayal Singh R/o Vill -
                  Devkuli, P.S. - Rampur Chouram, Dist. - Arwal

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Dharmendra Paswan
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Bharat Bhushan
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    10-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    APP for the State.

                                 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner

                    seeks permission to withdraw the present application.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed

                    any opinion on the merits of this case.

                                 5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.