Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Keshwar ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to strict conditions.

Summary

Keshwar Chauhan was arrested on 19 May 2025 in connection with a murder case (FIR dated 1 April 2025) alleging he and others killed Anita Devi, the daughter of an informant, under Sections 103(1), 238(a) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, had a clean antecedent, and that witnesses in the case diary indicated the deceased had committed suicide. The prosecution opposed bail, asserting an unnatural death and body disposal by the accused. The High Court, after considering the claim of suicide and the filing of a charge sheet, granted bail on a Rs 10,000 bond with two sureties, imposing conditions of cooperation, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of criminal antecedent. The bail order was subject to cancellation if the petitioner absented himself from two consecutive court dates without sufficient reason or concealed any prior criminal record.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to an accused in a murder case where the prosecution alleges an unnatural death but the defence claims the death was a suicide.
  • Whether the presence of witness statements indicating suicide and the filing of a charge sheet justify bail despite the seriousness of the offence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • suicide claim
  • criminal antecedent
  • Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita
  • conditions of bail
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72547 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2025 Thana- DHANAHA District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Keshwar Chauhan S/O Murari Chauhan R/O Village- Nuniyapatti, P.S-
                 Dhanaha, Distt.- West Champaran.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Shahbaj Alam, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Binod Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   12-03-2026                      Heard Mr. Shahbaj Alam, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner as well as         Mr. Binod Kumar, learned Additional

                   Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   19.05.2025 in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No. 103 of

                   2025, F.I.R. dated 01.04.2025 for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 103(1), 238(a), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita,

                   2023.

                               3.     According to prosecution case, the informant

                   alleged that the petitioner along with other accused persons

                   killed her daughter, namely, Anita Devi.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been

                   implicated in the present case merely on the basis that he is the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72547 of 2025(5) dt.12-03-2026
                                            2/3




          husband of the deceased. As per allegation in the FIR the

          petitioner and other accused persons committed the murder of

          the daughter of the informant and disposed the body of the

          deceased. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the

          F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not

          committed any offences as alleged in the F.I.R. He next submits

          that it has come during investigation that number of witnesses

          have stated in paragraph nos. 49,50,51 of the case diary that the

          deceased has committed suicide herself. He further submits that

          police after investigation has submitted charge sheet and trial

          has begun. The petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2025.

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and

          submits that daughter of the informant has died unnatural death

          and petitioner along with other co-accused persons have

          disposed the body of the deceased.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          and the fact that number of witnesses have stated that the

          deceased has committed suicide herself and charge has been

          framed against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72547 of 2025(5) dt.12-03-2026
                                                        3/3




                      satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-I Class, Bagaha,

                      West Champaran in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No. 103

                      of 2025, subject to the following conditions:-

                                   i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                      properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

                      and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

                      on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                      reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                   ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                      witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

                      move for cancellation of bail.

                                   iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                      verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                      any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.