Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ravindra Rai @ Ravindra pd YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, finding that the injuries were superficial and the circumstances warranted release on bond.

Summary

The petitioner, Ravindra Rai, was charged under several IPC sections for assaulting an informant and his family with weapons, causing injuries including a fractured head. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the injuries were superficial, there was no injury report for one victim, and that a counter‑case existed against the informant. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offenses. The court considered the superficial nature of the injuries, the existence of a case‑and‑counter‑case, the petitioner’s clean antecedent, and the length of his custody, and decided to grant bail. Bail was ordered on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and specific conditions under Section 480(3) of the Bihar Negotiable Security Act.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the offences alleged under the IPC
  • Whether the superficial injuries and existence of a counter‑case justify release on bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • assault
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • injury
  • clean antecedent
  • case and counter case

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73480 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2022 Thana- PIPRAKOTHI District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Ravindra Rai @ Ravindra Pd. Yadav S/O Rama Shish Rai R/O Village-
                 Mathiya Bariyar Pur, P.S- Pipra, Dist- East champran

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   21-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                02. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No. 132 of 2022 registered

                   for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307,

                   354B, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                03. As per prosecution case, the petitioner and other

                   co-accused persons armed with lathi, danda, iron rod, Farsa,

                   knife came to the doors of the informant and assaulted the

                   informant. When the elder brother of the informant intervened,

                   he was assaulted by this petitioner on his head causing fracture.

                   Other family members of the informant were also assaulted.

                                04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   there is no injury report of Narad Rai on record, though injury
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73480 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026
                                            2/3




          report of one Naresh Rai is on record and the said person is

          stated to be brother of the informant, but his injury is superficial

          as injury suffered by the person is stated to be incised wound on

          right parietal region of size 3"x1/3"x skin deep apart from bruise

          on left forehead of size 3"x1/2", though injury no. 1 is stated to

          be caused by sharp cutting substance and the weapon attributed

          to the petitioner is Farsa which is a heavy sharp cutting weapon

          and such superficial injury would not be caused by Farsa.

          Learned counsel further submits that there is case and counter

          and one Arvind Rai from the petitioner's side has filed case

          against the informant and others as they called his mother witch

          and assaulted the persons of the petitioner's side. The petitioner

          is having clean antecedent and he is in custody since

          22.07.2025. The charge sheet has been submitted.

                       05. Learned APP opposes the submission made on

          behalf of the petitioner.

                       06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          case and counter case between the parties and further

          considering the superficial nature of injury of the victim of

          assault by the petitioner and also considering the period of

          custody of the petitioner, his clean and submission of charge
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73480 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                      sheet, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on

                      bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)

                      with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                      learned     Chief     Judicial      Magistrate,      East   Champaran   at

                      Motihari/concerned Court in connection with Piprakothi P.S.

                      Case No. 132 of 2022, subject to the conditions mentioned in

                      Section 480(3) of B.N.S.S. and also the following conditions :

                                                       (i) One of the bailors will be a close

                                                       relative of the petitioner.

                                                       (ii) The petitioner will remain present

                                                       on each and every date fixed by the

                                                       court below.

                                                       (iii) In case of absence on three

                                                       consecutive dates or in violation of the

                                                       terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

                                                       petitioner will be liable to be cancelled

                                                       by the court concerned.



                                                (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

    DKS/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.