Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Praduman RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Petitioner Praduman Ray was arrested for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant, an offence punishable under Sections 96 and 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner claimed the incident stemmed from a consensual love relationship, and the victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS supported this claim, indicating she went with him voluntarily and wishes to continue the relationship. The State opposed bail, but the petitioner had no prior criminal record and had been in custody since 17 July 2025. Considering the victim’s testimony, the absence of any allegation of sexual assault, and the petitioner’s clean antecedent, the Court ordered his release on bail. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 96 and 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in a kidnapping case involving a minor.
  • Whether the victim’s voluntary statement of a love relationship negates the seriousness of the kidnapping allegation.
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of criminal antecedent and the pending chargesheet justify bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • minor
  • love relationship
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • criminal antecedent
  • sureties

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74027 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2025 Thana- CHANDI District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Praduman Ray S/O Tunnu Ray R/O Vill.- Bhadwar, P.S.- Chandi, Dist.-
                 Bhojpur.                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                             Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     Usha Devi W/O Binod Yadav R/O Vill.- Vishunpur, P.S.- Chandi, Dist.-
                  Bhojpur
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Ms. Priya, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   11-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State but, despite valid service of notice, none

                   appeared on behalf of opposite party no.2.

                                    2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for

                   the offence punishable under Sections 96 and 137 (2) of the

                   Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                    3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner in

                   association of other family members is said to have kidnapped

                   the minor daughter of the informant.

                                    4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the

                   petitioner that the present case arises out of love relationship

                   between the petitioner and the victim. The occurrence is said to

                   have taken place on 26.05.2025, while the information to the

                   police was given on 10.07.2025, without tendering any plausible

                   explanation. Further, after recovery of the victim her statement
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74027 of 2025(4) dt.11-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      was recorded under Section 180 and 183 BNSS. It would be

                      evident from the statements that she was in relationship with the

                      petitioner and gone along with him out of her own volition,

                      stayed 1½ months as husband and wife in a rented

                      accommodation and she also desired to be with him in future.

                      The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been

                      languishing in custody since 17.07.2025.

                                      5. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail

                      petition.

                                      6. Taking into consideration the facts and

                      circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the

                      chargesheet has already been submitted and the victim has

                      accepted that she was in love relationship and has not alleged

                      any sexual assault or misdeed against the petitioner coupled

                      with the fact that the petitioner, who is a young boy having no

                      criminal antecedent, the above named petitioner is directed to be

                      enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees

                      Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is

                      pending/successor Court in connection with Chandi P.S. Case

                      No.111 of 2025.

                                                (Soni Shrivastava, J)

Trivedi/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.