Patna High Court
Sohail AhmadversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RAJIV ROY
Holding
The anticipatory bail petition was withdrawn and dismissed as the petitioner had surrendered.
Summary
The petitioner, Sohail Ahmad, was facing arrest in a criminal case (Siwan Rail P.S. Case No. 94 of 2025) for alleged offences under sections 318(4), 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. He filed an anticipatory bail application. While the matter was pending, the petitioner surrendered before the court. His counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition on the ground of surrender. The court allowed the withdrawal, holding that the petition could be withdrawn after surrender. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner surrenders before the court
Legislation cited
- B.N.S. — s. 317(4), 317(5), 318(4), 3(5)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal of petition
- surrender
- criminal procedure
- B.N.S. sections 318 317 3
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74574 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2025 Thana- SIWAN RAIL P.S. District- Saran
======================================================
Sohail Ahmad S/O Ali Akbar Resident of M.M. Colony, P.S.- Siwan Town,
Distt.- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
3 21-01-2026 Heard Mrs. Shyama Rani, learned counsel for the
petitioner and the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in
connection with Siwan Rail P.S. Case No. 94 of 2025 for the
offence under sections 318(4), 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) of the
B.N.S. lodged on 18.07.2025 by the informant, Shailendra Kumar
Pandey.
3. It has been informed by the learned counsel for the
petitioner that the sole petitioner has surrendered in the Court and
as such, she may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
4. Permission accorded.
5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-
U
Checking your session…