Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Tanik Yadav @ Om Prakash Yadav @ Om Prakash GautamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Tanik Yadav, filed an application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a 2015 charge. The petitioner sought to withdraw the application so that the matter could be taken up after the framing of charge. The State of Bihar opposed the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to approach the Court again after charge framing.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may permit the withdrawal of the pending application

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • charge framing
  • high court order

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74824 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-455 Year-2015 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya
                  ======================================================
                  Tanik Yadav @ Om Prakash Yadav @ Om Prakash Gautam S/O Late Kuldeep
                  Yadav Resident of village- Mohra, Police Station- Atri, District- Gaya
                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                  The State of Bihar Patna
                                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    13-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    APP for the State.

                                 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                    petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present application in

                    order to approach this Court after framing of charge.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.



                                               (Soni Shrivastava, J)
anand/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.