Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kumari Rina Yadav @ Reena YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Given the petitioner’s lack of criminal antecedent, her dismissal from employment, and her status as a woman, the court extended anticipatory bail subject to strict conditions.

Summary

Petitioner Kumari Rina Yadav was implicated in a FIR (Hathua P.S. Case No. 133 of 2023) for alleged forgery and related offences under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. She contended that the certificate in question was genuine and that she had no prior criminal record, seeking anticipatory bail. The State argued that despite a previous opportunity to resign, she did not do so, and the FIR remains pending. The Court noted her dismissal from the teaching post, lack of antecedents, and her status as a woman, and therefore inclined to grant anticipatory bail with stringent conditions. Accordingly, the Court ordered her release on bail upon arrest or surrender within four weeks, subject to a bond and several compliance conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the pending FIR and alleged offences
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of criminal antecedent and dismissal from employment justify granting bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • forgery
  • IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B
  • criminal procedure
  • bail conditions
  • female accused
  • resignation
  • dismissal

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75095 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2023 Thana- HATHUA District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Kumari Rina Yadav @ Reena Yadav D/O Dharmendra Yadav Resident of
                 Village- Amwa, P.S.- Bhore, Distt.-Gopalganj.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Dewanand Tiwari, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ajay Mishra, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   24-02-2026                  Heard Mr. Dewanand Tiwari, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Ajay Mishra, learned APP.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in

                   connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 133 of 2023 for the

                   offence under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the

                   Indian Penal Code lodged on 03.06.2023 by the informant,

                   Ramashankar Ram.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the informant, a

                   Panchayat Secretary with Hatua Block, Gopalganj, alleged that

                   the petitioner, on the basis of certificate, joined as a teacher but

                   upon inquiry, it was found to be forged and accordingly, the FIR.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that her

                   certificate was genuine but now that the inquiry committee has

                   considered it as fake, she shall be pursing her civil remedy, she
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75095 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026
                                            2/3




          has resigned/dismissed, has no criminal antecedent and if granted

          bail, shall be diligently cooperating in the investigation/trial.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that

          despite the long rope given by the Patna High Court in CWJC

          No. 12663 of 2022, she chose not to resign which followed the

          FIR.

                       6. Though it is unfortunate that Patna High Court in

          CWJC No. 12663 of 2022 gave long rope to the accused and she

          despite the same, chose not to resign but now that she has already

          been dismissed, has no criminal antecedent, is a lady, FIR is there

          and she shall be facing the music, in that background, this Court

          is inclined to extend her the privilege of anticipatory bail with

          conditions.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of

          arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt

          of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned CJM, Gopalganj in connection with

          Hathua P.S. Case No. 133 of 2023 subject to the following

          conditions:

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document (Aadhaar Card/Voter ID Card/Pan Card/Driving
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75095 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026
                                                      3/3




                    License) to show his/her bona fide;

                                 (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                    before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

                    dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail

                    bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                 (iii) the petitioner shall be appearing before the Police

                    Station as and when required for cooperating in the investigation;

                                 (iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

                    promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                    failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                    cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                 (v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                    criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                    to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.



                                                   (Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.