Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Indrajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Indrajit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a seizure of 1,047 grams of heroin from a swift car and charged under sections 8(c), 21(c), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act. He contended that he was merely a passenger, not the owner or driver, and had no prior criminal record, having been in judicial custody since 31 May 2025. The State opposed regular bail, relying on diary entries that placed the petitioner’s movements between Ghazipur and Ara. After hearing both sides, the Court found the petitioner’s claim plausible and, considering the circumstances, ordered his release on regular bail. The bail was conditioned on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, to be approved by the Special Judge of the NDPS Court in Bhojpur.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under the NDPS Act despite the seriousness of the alleged offence and the quantity of heroin seized.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • NDPS Act
  • regular bail
  • drug trafficking
  • heroin seizure
  • criminal procedure
  • bail application

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75224 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2025 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Indrajit Kumar S/O Mr. Baldeo Paswan Mohalla Paswan Toli Anaith P.S. Ara
                 Nawada, Dist. Bhojpur

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   15-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 8(c), 21(c) ,

                   25 and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that from a swift

                   dezire car, two packets of heroin having weight of 523 gm and

                   524 gm in total 1047 gm was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned

                   counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is

                   neither the owner nor the driver of the said vehicle rather he has

                   taken life in the said car and was apprehended by the police.

                   Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75224 of 2025(3) dt.15-01-2026
                                                        2/2




                      languishing in judicial custody since 31.05.2025.

                                   5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                      vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has

                      submitted that from perusal of the para- 146 of the case diary, it

                      is clear that the tower location of this petitioner was found from

                      Ghazipur to Ara.

                                   6. From perusal of the para-146 of the diary, it is clear

                      that the location of this petitioner is only in Anaith, Bhojpur and

                      this goes to show that the defense taken by the petitioner that he

                      has taken lift in the car seems to be believable.

                                   7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                      petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with

                      Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 354 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond

                      of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of learned Principal District and

                      Sessions Judge cum Special Judge (NDPS), Bhojpur at Ara.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
shubham/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.