Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhagwan Rai @ Bhagyanarayan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to strict conditions.

Summary

Petitioner Bhagwan Rai sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Ramgarhwa PS Case No. 259 of 2025) for alleged fraud and intimidation under sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. The informant claimed that the petitioner’s son, Amit Kumar Rai, took Rs. 6.40 lakh on a false promise of employment and later threatened the informant when he demanded the money back. The petitioner argued that he had no role in the alleged offence, has no criminal antecedent, and is being implicated solely because of his relationship with his son. The State contended that both the petitioner and his son threatened the informant. Considering that the main allegation is against the son and the petitioner’s clean record, the Court granted anticipatory bail with a set of conditions, including a bail bond, sureties, and compliance with procedural requirements. The order directs that the petitioner be released on bail if arrested or surrenders within four weeks, subject to the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to Bhagwan Rai despite allegations of fraud and intimidation.
  • Whether the petitioner can be held liable for the alleged offences committed by his son.
  • Whether the conditions imposed are sufficient to safeguard the investigation and trial.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • fraud
  • intimidation
  • Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act
  • criminal procedure
  • father-son liability
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75486 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2025 Thana- RAMGARHWA District- East
                                                       Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Bhagwan Rai @ Bhagyanarayan Rai S/o Gaya Rai R/o Village- Satpipra
                 Bhumihar Tola, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, Dist- East Champaran

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Dhananjay Kumar II, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   25-02-2026                  Heard Mr. Dhananjay Kumar No. II, learned counsel

                   for the petitioner and the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Ramgarhwa P.S. Case No. 259 of 2025 for the

                   offence under sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(2) and 3(5) of the

                   BNS lodged on 13.07.2025 by the informant, Mukesh Kumar.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged

                   that the accused persons, on the pretext of giving job, took away

                   Rs. 6,40,000/- but thereafter, stopped picking up the phone and

                   when he wanted to get the money back, both the petitioner and

                   his son threatened him of dire consequences. This led to the

                   FIR.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75486 of 2025(3) dt.25-02-2026
                                            2/3




          admittedly the role of taking money is on his son, he has no role

          to play, has no criminal antecedent and only because he is father

          of Amit Kumar Rai, got implicated.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that

          after the informant wanted money back, he alongwith his son,

          threatened him of dire consequences.

                       6. Taking into account the submissions of the parties

          as also that main allegation is against Amit Kumar Rai, he has

          no criminal antecedent and the amount has gone in the account

          of his son, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend

          him the privilege of anticipatory bail with conditions.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of

          arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the

          receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

          (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned CJM, Motihari, East Champaran in

          connection with Ramgarhwa P.S. Case No. 259 of 2025 subject

          to the following conditions:

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document (Aadhaar Card/Voter ID Card/Pan Card/Driving

          License) to show his/her bona fide;
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75486 of 2025(3) dt.25-02-2026
                                                      3/3




                                 (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                    before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

                    dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his

                    bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                 (iii) the petitioner shall be appearing before the Police

                    Station as and when required for cooperating in the

                    investigation;

                                 (iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

                    promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                    failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                    cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                 (v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                    criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                    to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.



                                                   (Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.