Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Afzal RayeenversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court held that bail could not be granted and rejected the petitioner's application.

Summary

The petitioner, Afzal Rayeen, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging he inflicted a knife blow on the informant's husband, who later died. The petitioner claimed false implication, highlighted a two‑day delay in filing the FIR and the absence of corroboration in the injury report, and offered to cooperate with the trial. The State opposed bail, asserting the petitioner was one of the assailants and noting that the trial had already examined five prosecution witnesses with four more pending. The court examined the stage of the trial and the seriousness of the allegation that the petitioner caused a fatal injury. Considering the evidence on record and the progress of the trial, the court refused to grant bail.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in view of the alleged fatal assault and the stage of trial.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • murder
  • fatal assault
  • FIR delay
  • trial stage
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • sections 103(1)
  • section 3(5)

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7567 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2025 Thana- CHORAUT District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Afzal Rayeen S/O Anwar Rayeen Resident of Village- Choraut, Ward No. 7,
                 P.S.- Choraut, District- Sitamarhi

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s       :      Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

6   01-06-2026                      1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                        2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Choraut P.S. Case no.97

                   of 2025 registered under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the

                   Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                    3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said

                   to have inflicted a knife blow on the back of the husband of the

                   informant while others assaulted him with bricks etc. The

                   husband of the informant succumbed to his injury in course of

                   treatment.

                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case along with the

                   other members of his family including his mother. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7567 of 2026(6) dt.01-06-2026
                                            2/3




          allegation of repeated knife blow by the petitioner is not

          supported by the injury report. Inspite of the occurrence

          allegedly having taken place on 7.7.2025, the FIR was lodged

          only two days later on 9.7.2025 without there being any

          explanation for the delay. The petitioner is in custody since

          16.7.2025 and undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

                             5. The application for bail is opposed by learned

          A.P.P. for the State who submits that the petitioner is one of the

          assailants of the deceased and the trial has proceeded in the

          learned trial Court.

                           6. A report was called for with respect to the stage

          of trial from the learned trial Court. As per the report received

          contained in letter dated 8.5.2026 of the District and Additional

          Sessions Judge IX, Sitamarhi, five prosecution witnesses have

          been examined on behalf of the prosecution while four remain

          to be examined.

                         7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in

          the FIR wherein it is stated that the petitioner inflicted a knife

          blow on the back of her husband who died subsequently in

          course of treatment and the trial having proceeded with

          examination of five prosecution witnesses, the Court is not
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7567 of 2026(6) dt.01-06-2026
                                                        3/3




                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is

                      rejected.



                                                  (Partha Sarthy, J)
Saurabh/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.