Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sarfraz @ Md. Sarfraz @ AjmalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Regular bail was denied as the trial was nearing its conclusion.

Summary

The petitioners, Sarfraz and Md. Prawej, applied for regular bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code, including murder and attempt to murder. Their earlier bail applications had been rejected by the court. The informant’s counsel submitted that the trial evidence had been closed and presented a certified copy of an order dated 10‑02‑2026. The court observed that the trial was nearing its conclusion and therefore denied the bail application. It directed the trial court to expedite the remaining proceedings without unnecessary adjournments. The petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted to the accused when the trial is on the verge of conclusion

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • regular bail
  • IPC offences
  • trial expeditious
  • high court
  • adjournments

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75730 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-595 Year-2022 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sarfraz @ Md. Sarfraz @ Ajmal S/O Md. Sabbir @ Md. Sabbir Ahmad @
                  Md. Shabbir Ahmad Resident of Village- Badarbanna, Police Station-
                  Bahera, District- Darbhanga
           2.    Md. Prawej @ Md. Anwar Ahmad @ Parwez S/O Md. Sabbir @ Md. Sabbir
                 Ahmad @ Md. Shabbir Ahmad Resident of Village- Badarbanna, Police
                 Station- Bahera, District- Darbhanga

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar Patna

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shashi Ranjan Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP
                                                  Mr. Pankaj Kumar Jha
                                                  Mr. Abhijeet Gautam
                                                  Mr. Vijay Kishore Bharti
                                                  Mr. Rajesh Kumar Chaubey
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   12-02-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned

                   APP for the State and the learned counsel for the informant.

                                2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioners. The

                   petitioners seek bail in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No.

                   595 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 302, 341,

                   323, 307, 379, 147, 148, 149, 427 and 34 of the Indian Penal

                   Code.

                                3. Earlier the regular bail application of the petitioner

                   no. 1 was rejected on 19.03.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 84222 of

                   2023 and the regular bail application of the petitioner no. 2 was
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75730 of 2025(3) dt.12-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      rejected on 23.05.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 26705 of 2023.

                                   4. The learned counsel for the informant submits that

                      the evidence has been closed. He has also produced a photocopy

                      of the certified copy of the order dated 10.02.2026 in this

                      regard, which is taken on record.

                                   5. In view of the fact that the trial is on the verge of

                      conclusion, this application for regular bail is hereby rejected.

                                   6. The Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial at

                      the earliest, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either

                      party.



                                                         (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.