Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Hemchandra GiriversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to strict conditions, finding no sufficient ground to deny bail despite the procedural objections raised.

Summary

Hemchandra Giri was arrested in Sheohar district for alleged possession of 8.75 kg of a ganja‑like substance, alleged to violate Sections 8, 20(B) and II B of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the seizure was not made from his conscious possession, that there was no independent witness to the seizure list as required by Section 15 of the NDPS Act, that the quantity was below commercial threshold, and that no forensic scientific laboratory (FSL) report accompanied the charge‑sheet. The State opposed bail. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions such as cooperation with the trial, regular attendance before the police, and restrictions on tampering with evidence or witnesses.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted in an NDPS case where the alleged quantity is below commercial threshold and procedural safeguards under Section 15 are alleged to be absent.
  • Whether the absence of an FSL report and lack of an independent witness to the seizure list justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • drug possession
  • seizure procedure
  • commercial quantity
  • FSL report
  • sureties

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7586 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-248 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRAHI District- Sheohar
                 ======================================================
                 Hemchandra Giri, son of Late Rampukar Giri, R/o Village - Dekuli
                 Dharampur, P.S. - Piprahi, Distt. -Sheohar

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Deepak Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Piprahi P.S. Case No. 248 of 2025 dated 29.11.2025

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8,

                   20(B), II B of the N.D.P.S. Act.

                                3. Allegation is of recovery of 8.750 kg Ganja like

                   substance from the possession of the petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in

                   this case. It is submitted that nothing has been recovered

                   from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7586 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/3




          submitted that there is no independent witness to the seizure

          list, which is against the provision of Section 15 of the

          N.D.P.S. Act. It is also submitted that the seized Ganja like

          substance is less than the commercial quantity.                   The

          petitioner is in custody since 30.11.2025, having no

          criminal antecedents and charge-sheet has been submitted in

          the case without F.S.L report.

                       5. Learned A.P.P for the State opposes the prayer

          for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Having considered the facts and circumstances

          of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the

          parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

          Principal Sessions Judge, Sheohar in connection with

          Piprahi P.S. Case No. 248 of 2025, subject to the following

          conditions:-

                                  1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and
                          shall be properly represented on each and every
                          date fixed by the Court and on his absence on two
                          consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail
                          bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7586 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                                               2. One of the bailors will be his own blood
                                      relation, preferably father, mother, brother, sister
                                      and or his wife.

                                               3. The bailor shall also state on affidavit that
                                      he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner
                                      is made accused in any other case of similar nature
                                      after his release in the present case and thereafter
                                      the court below will be at liberty to initiate the
                                      proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of
                                      misuse.

                                               4. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence
                                      or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will
                                      be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

                                               5. The petitioner within two weeks of his
                                      release from custody shall appear before the S.H.O.
                                      of his local area alongwith a copy of this order and
                                      shall appear every fortnightly to mark his
                                      attendance till the framing of charge in the trial
                                      court.



                                                   (Khatim Reza, J)
prabhat/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.