Patna High Court

Golu Kumar @ Goloo KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 22 January 2026
Disposal: DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Bench: RAJESH KUMAR VERMA

Holding

The bail application is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, filed a bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a police station case. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Dhannjay Kumar II, stated that he had already given no objection to the petitioner’s pairvikar (substitution) and expressed no further concern. The State’s counsel, Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, appeared for the respondents. The Court considered the lack of objection and the absence of any prosecution proceeding. Consequently, the Court dismissed the bail application on the ground of non‑prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma.

Issues considered

Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the circumstances
Whether the case qualifies as a non‑prosecution warranting dismissal of the bail application

Subjects

bail
criminal procedure
non‑prosecution
High Court
pairvikar

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76278 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2025 Thana- JITNA District- East Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Golu Kumar @ Goloo Kumar Son of Ramdaras Rai R/o village- Ekdari P.S.
                  -Chhauraadano Dist- East Champaran

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar
            2.    S.I. Thakara Ram son of Late Jaswanta Ram Resident Of Village- Sitodai
                  Ps- Sanghd Dist- Jaislmer Rajastan at present Posted SSB 71 Bataliyan
                  Barhrwa Check Out Post Barila

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Dhannjay Kumar Ii, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

4    22-01-2026                    Heard Mr. Dhannjay Kumar Ii, learned counsel for

                    the petitioner and Mr. Sunil Kumar Padney, learned APP for the

                    State.

                                 2. Mr. Dhannjay Kumar Ii informed this Court that he

                    has already given no objection to the pairvikar of the petitioner

                    and he has no concern about the present case.

                                 3. In view of the statement made above, this bail

                    application stands dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                           (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-

U      T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…