Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court allowed the bail application, granting regular bail subject to specified bond and conditions.

Summary

Ajay Kumar was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for murder, with the prosecution alleging that he administered a lethal injection to the deceased. The trial court had earlier denied his bail application, relying on a confession and case diary entries. The petitioner argued that the forensic science laboratory report indicated death due to aluminium phosphide (Celphos) found in the victim's viscera, undermining the injection allegation. The State opposed bail but conceded that the FSL report weakened the prosecution's theory. The Patna High Court, after considering the report and the earlier rejection, granted regular bail subject to a bond of ₹30,000 and compliance with conditions under the Bihar Non-Compounding of Offences Act, 2023, and assured that the petitioner would not abscond in other pending cases.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the earlier bail rejection and the nature of the charges under IPC Sections 302 and 34.
  • Whether the forensic report indicating death by aluminium phosphide negates the prosecution's allegation of an injection and warrants bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • IPC 302
  • IPC 34
  • forensic science report
  • aluminium phosphide
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76365 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-802 Year-2023 Thana- RAJIVNAGAR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Ajay Kumar S/o Mahendra Sahni @ Mahendra Choudhary R/o Village - PNT
                 Colony, Kidwaipuri, P.S - Budha Colony, District - Patna

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Rahul Raj, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   16-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Sessions Trial No. 911 of 2025, arising out of Rajiv Nagar P.S.

                   Case No. 802 of 2023, lodged on 15.12.2023, under Sections

                   302 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected vide order

                   dated 18.01.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 86030 of 2024.

                   Counsel further submits that this Hon’ble Court was pleased to

                   reject the bail application on the basis of the alleged confession

                   as well as the materials available in the case diary, wherein there

                   was an allegation of administering an injection to the deceased,

                   resulting in his death.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76365 of 2025(3) dt.16-01-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned counsel further submits that in the

          impugned order, it has been categorically observed by the

          learned Sessions Court that, as per the FSL report, the death was

          caused due to ‘Aluminium Phosphide’, commonly known as

          ‘Celphos’, which was detected in the viscera of the deceased as

          a gastrointestinal irritant.

                       5. Learned counsel also submits that the Trial Court,

          after such observation, has rejected the bail application of the

          petitioner solely on the ground that this Hon’ble Court had

          earlier rejected the bail application of the petitioner.

                       6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail but submits that, in view of the FSL report observing that

          ‘Celphos’ was found in the stomach of the deceased, the

          allegation of administering an injection has been diminished.

                       7. In the present facts and circumstances of the case

          and in view of the submissions made above, let the petitioner

          above-named be granted bail, subject to the satisfaction of the

          Trial Court that the petitioner is not absconding in Buddha

          Colony P.S. Case No. 173 of 2020 and Sonepur P.S. Case No.

          580 of 2023, on furnishing bail bonds of ₹30,000/- (Rupees

          Thirty Thousand) as defined under Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS,

          2023, to the satisfaction of the District & Additional Sessions
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76365 of 2025(3) dt.16-01-2026
                                                      3/3




                    Judge-XXIX, Patna, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 911

                    of 2025, arising out of Rajiv Nagar P.S. Case No. 802 of 2023,

                    subject to the conditions laid down under Section 480(3) of the

                    BNSS, 2023.



                                                                         (Dr. Anshuman, J.)

Aman Kumar/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.