Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Govind Yadav @ Dhoni YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court held that bail could not be granted and rejected the petitioner's application.

Summary

The petitioner, Govind Yadav, was arrested in May 2021 in connection with a case under Sections 399, 402 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Sections 483 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail, after an earlier bail plea had been rejected. The State opposed the bail, and the court examined the trial record, noting that the case was at the argument stage. Considering the seriousness of the offences and the advanced stage of trial, the court declined to grant bail and ordered the trial court to expedite the proceedings. The bail application was therefore dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted under Sections 483 and 484 of the BNSS, 2023 to a petitioner charged with offences under the IPC and Arms Act at the argument stage of trial.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • regular bail
  • criminal miscellaneous application
  • IPC
  • Arms Act
  • trial stage
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7718 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2021 Thana- BUXAR District- Buxar
                 ======================================================
                 Govind Yadav @ Dhoni Yadav Son of Birendra Yadav @ Birendra Singh
                 Resident of village - Bijhaura, Police Station - Itarhi, District - Buxar.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Manish Rai Sharma, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   08-05-2026                  Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The present criminal miscellaneous application has

                   been filed under Sections 483 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik

                   Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNSS,

                   2023’) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, who is in

                   custody in connection with S.T. No.277 of 2023, arising out of

                   Buxar (Town) P.S. Case No. 147 of 2021, lodged on 08.03.2021,

                   under Sections 399/402/120B of the Indian Penal Code and

                   under Sections 25(1-b)A/26/35 of the Arms Act.

                                3. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected

                   vide order dated 02.12.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.49717 of

                   2024.

                                4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7718 of 2026(5) dt.08-05-2026
                                                      2/2




                    petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel

                    submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.05.2021. He

                    submits that on the previous occasion a report regarding stage of

                    the Trial was called for.

                                 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

                    bail of the petitioner and submits that report has come.

                                 6. Upon perusal of the report, it transpires that the

                    case is running at the stage of argument.

                                 7. In this background, this Court is not inclined to

                    grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, the prayer for bail of the

                    petitioner is hereby rejected. The Trial Court is directed to

                    expedite the Trial and conclude the same at the earliest.



                                                                        (Dr. Anshuman, J)
    Mkr./-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.