Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Teja Singh @ Tej Pratap Singh @ Taj Pratap SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to petitioner No.1, Teja Singh, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

Petitioner No.1, Teja Singh, a 75‑year‑old farmer, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 105 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for the death of an informant’s son who allegedly touched a naked electric wire laid by the petitioner in his field on 25‑06‑2025. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner’s wire caused the electrocution, while the petitioner contends the wire was installed for irrigation and the death was a pure accident, emphasizing his clean antecedents and frail health. The petition for anticipatory bail for petitioner No.2, Amit Singh, had been withdrawn earlier. The State opposed the bail on the ground of the seriousness of the alleged offence. Considering the petitioner’s age, health, lack of prior record, and the accidental nature of the incident, the Court allowed anticipatory bail to petitioner No.1, subject to a bail‑bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and compliance with Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to Teja Singh despite allegations under Sections 105 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
  • Whether the circumstances amount to a culpable offence or an accidental death warranting denial of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • accidental death
  • electric wire
  • negligence
  • Section 105
  • Section 3(5)
  • Section 482(2)
  • high court
  • clean antecedents
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77297 of 2025

                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2025 Thana- AANDAR District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
           1.    Teja Singh @ Tej Pratap Singh @ Taj Pratap Singh S/o Yadunath Singh R/o
                 Village- Madeshilapur, PS- Andar, Distt- Siwan
           2.    Amit Singh S/o Teja Singh @ Tej Pratap Singh R/o Village- Madeshilapur,
                 PS- Andar, Distt- Siwan

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioners     :        Mr. Ashok Singh, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   21-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

                                2. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to

                   Petitioner No. 2, namely Amit Singh, has already been

                   dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 11.02.2026.

                                3. Petitioner No. 1 apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 105 and

                   3(5) of the B.N.S..

                                4. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on

                   25.06.2025, when son of informant was passing through the

                   field of this petitioner, in the meantime, he got electrocuted due
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77297 of 2025(5) dt.21-04-2026
                                            2/3




          to the naked electric wire laid by this petitioner.

                        5. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

          behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has

          committed no offence. It is a case of accidental death. As a

          matter of fact, petitioner had laid electric wire in his fields since

          long for irrigation work and while passing through the fields,

          the son of informant accidentally came in contact with the same

          and got electrocuted. Petitioner is 75 years old and suffering

          from various ailments. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

                        6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the

          petitioner.

                        7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and clean

          antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory

          bail to Petitioner No. 1 is allowed.

                        8. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within

          a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named

          Petitioner No. 1 be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of

          Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First

          Class, Siwan in connection with Ander P.S. Case No. 184 of
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77297 of 2025(5) dt.21-04-2026
                                                         3/3




                       2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of

                       the B.N.S.S..



                                             (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.