Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prince Kumar Singh @ Prince SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The petitioner is entitled to bail subject to the conditions imposed under Section 480(3) of the BNSS.

Summary

Prince Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault and robbery of an informant who allegedly opposed a snatching of cash and a gold ring. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due to a land dispute and that the informant filed the case to prevent him from testifying in a separate murder investigation involving his relatives. The prosecution argued that the petitioner assaulted the informant with the butt of a pistol, causing injury, and that the offences were serious. The court considered the nature of the allegations, the petitioner’s custody period, the submission of the charge sheet, and the lack of intent to cause death. Weighing these factors, the court ordered the petitioner’s release on bail with specified conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the serious nature of the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 126(1), 303(2), 109(1), 351(1) and 3(5) of the BNS.
  • Whether the allegations constitute a false implication warranting bail.
  • Whether the conditions prescribed under Section 480(3) of the BNSS are applicable.

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 109(1), 115(2), 126(1), 303(2), 3(5), 351(1)
  • BNSS — s. 480(3)

Subjects

  • bail
  • false implication
  • assault
  • robbery
  • Section 480(3)
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Indian Penal Code

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77398 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2025 Thana- JIRADEI District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Prince Kumar Singh @ Prince Singh S/O Vidya Singh @ Vidya Sagar Singh
                 Resident of Vill- Mukundpur, P.S- Ziradeyi, Distt.- Siwan.
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mrs.Kumari Anupam, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER
4   07-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Ziradeyi P.S. Case No. 16 of 2025, registered

                   for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(1), 303(2), 109(1),

                   351(1), 3(5) of the BNS.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner and other co-

                   accused persons assaulted the informant when he opposed their

                   act of snatching Rs.2,300/- cash and a gold ring from the

                   informant.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated

                   in this case and there is land dispute between the parties who are

                   agnates. Prior to lodging of the present case, the petitioner side

                   has lodged Ziradeyi P.S. Case No. 15 of 2025. The FIR has been

                   lodged after a delay of 11 days for which there is no proper

                   explanation. The true fact of the case is that the uncle of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77398 of 2025(4) dt.07-01-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner was murdered by his agnates Lal Babu Singh and his

          family members for which Ziradeyi P.S. Case No. 82 of 2020

          was lodged and petitioner is one of the witnesses in the said

          case. The informant has filed this fabricated case only to keep

          away the petitioner to adduce his evidence in Ziradeyi P.S. Case

          No. 82 of 2020. Moreover only allegation against the petitioner

          is that he assaulted the informant on his head by means of butt

          of a pistol and there was no intention to cause death. The

          petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2025 and charge sheet has

          been submitted. The petitioner is having one antecedent and the

          said case has also been lodged by one of the family members of

          the informant and petitioner is on bail in the said case.

                       5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the

          submission made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned APP

          submits that the allegation against the petitioner and another is

          of snatching cash and gold ring from the informant on gun point

          and this petitioner hit him on his head with the butt of the pistol

          causing its fracture.

                       6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and

          submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          general and omnibus nature of allegation against the petitioner

          and also considering his period of custody and submission of
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77398 of 2025(4) dt.07-01-2026
                                                         3/3




                       charge sheet, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on

                       furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand

                       Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                       satisfaction of learned JMFC, Siwan/concerned court, in

                       connection with Ziradeyi P.S. Case No. 16 of 2025, subject to

                       the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and

                       other following conditions:

                                               (i) One of the bailors will be a close

                                               relative of the petitioner.

                                               (ii) The petitioner will remain present on

                                               each and every date fixed by the court

                                               below, if so required by the learned trial

                                               court.

                                               (iii) In case of absence on three

                                               consecutive dates or in violation of the

                                               terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

                                               petitioner will be liable to be cancelled

                                               by the court concerned.



                                                 (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Anuradha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.