Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shubham SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner with a bond and conditions, finding that the procedural lapse and pending cases did not warrant denial of bail.

Summary

Shubham Sah was arrested on 15 July 2025 for allegedly being caught red‑handed with a stolen motorcycle, charged under Sections 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He filed a bail petition, arguing that Section 103(4) of the same Act had not been complied with and that a co‑accused had already been granted bail. The State opposed bail, noting that the motorcycle recovered from the petitioner was confirmed as looted and that the petitioner has fifteen other criminal cases, with fourteen already on bail. The High Court considered the facts, the petitioner’s criminal antecedents, and the procedural lapse, and ordered bail on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of antecedents. The bail order was directed to be implemented without delay for verification purposes.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite alleged non‑compliance of Section 103(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.
  • Whether the petitioner’s extensive criminal record and admission of possession of stolen property preclude bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • theft
  • stolen motorcycle
  • Section 103(4)
  • B.N.S. 2023
  • criminal antecedent
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77529 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2025 Thana- RIGA District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Shubham Sah Son of Ravi Shankar Sah Resident of Village- Basha Ward No.
                 8, P.S.- Bajpatti, District- Sitamarhi

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State            :        Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   21-01-2026                     Heard Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Anant Kumar 1, learned APP for the State.

                                 2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   15.07.2025, in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 270 of 2025,

                   F.I.R. dated 14.07.2025 registered for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 317(5), 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.

                                 3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he was

                   caught red handed with the stolen motorcycle.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   although the petitioner was apprehended along with the

                   motorcycle in question but there is non compliance of Section

                   103(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and co-accused person namely Shiv

                   Shankar Raut who was also apprehended along with the

                   petitioner has been granted bail by the learned Court below
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77529 of 2025(4) dt.21-01-2026
                                            2/3




          itself vide order dated 26.11.2025 passed in B.P. No. 1285 of

          2025. He further submits that the police after investigation

          submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is

          in custody since 15.07.2025.

                       5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

          State has vehemently opposed the prayer for              bail of the

          petitioner and submits that recovery has been made from the

          possession of the petitioner and petitioner has accepted that the

          recovered motorcycle is the looted motorcycle and apart from

          aforesaid the petitioner carries fifteen more cases other than the

          present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the

          bail petition that out of fifteen cases, petitioner is on bail in

          fourteen cases and one case is pending for consideration before

          the competent court of law.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Sitamarhi in

          connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 270 of 2025, subject to the

          following conditions :-

                       (1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77529 of 2025(4) dt.21-01-2026
                                                           3/3




                         properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

                         and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

                         on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                         reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                      (2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                         witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                         for cancellation of bail.

                                      (3) And, further condition that the court below shall

                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                         any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                         criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.             However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                                       (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.