Patna High Court
Manoj SahversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
A second anticipatory bail petition is not maintainable and must be dismissed.
Summary
Manoj Sah filed a second anticipatory bail petition after his earlier petition was rejected on 25 September 2024. The petition was filed under Cr. Misc. No. 77855 of 2025. The court noted that the application did not disclose any change in circumstances or any new ground for relief. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in G.R. Ananda Babu v. State of Tamil Nadu (2021 SCC OnLine SC 176), the judge held that a second anticipatory bail petition is not maintainable. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether a second anticipatory bail petition can be entertained when the first petition has been rejected
- Whether the Supreme Court precedent in G.R. Ananda Babu v. State of Tamil Nadu bars a second anticipatory bail application
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- second petition
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Supreme Court precedent
- bail jurisdiction
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77855 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2023 Thana- BEERPUR District- Begusarai
======================================================
Manoj Sah S/o- Late Ramdeo Sah Resident of village- Muzaffara Ps- Beerpur
District- Begusarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lal Mani Sharma, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 05-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This is second anticipatory bail petition. Earlier, the
petition, filed for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of
petitioner, stood rejected, vide order dated 25.09.2024 passed
in Cr. Misc. No. 61306 of 2024 .
3 . This application does not reveal any change of
circumstances or new ground.
4. In view of the recent judgment of the Hon’ble
Supreme Court in the case of G.R. Ananda Babu Vs. State of
Tamil Nadu and Anrs reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 176,
the second anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is not
maintainable. It is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Koushik/-
U T
Checking your session…