Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dhananjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner subject to the conditions imposed by the Court.

Summary

The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 580 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the B.N.S., 2023, including assault and causing injury. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted the informant’s family over a cow‑dung dispute, causing head injuries and a fractured finger. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that the injury was not on a vital part of the body, and that he has a clean antecedent and is a Panchayat teacher. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The Court examined the allegations, the petitioner’s claim of false implication, and the risk of flight, and decided to grant anticipatory bail subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC read with Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. The order stipulated bail bonds, sureties, personal presence in court, and provisions for cancellation if conditions are breached.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in view of the alleged offences.
  • Whether the nature of the alleged assault and injury justifies denial of bail.
  • Whether there is a likelihood of the petitioner fleeing or tampering with evidence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 B.N.S.S.
  • assault
  • false implication
  • bail conditions
  • Bihar criminal law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77876 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-580 Year-2025 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad
                 ======================================================
                 Dhananjay Kumar S/o Judagi Sao R/o Village- Kharaka, P.S- Makhdumpur,
                 Dist- Jehanabad

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate
                                                 Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                                                 Mr. Vivek Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   21-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with

                   Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 580 of 2025 registered for the

                   offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 126(2),

                   117(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has

                   stated that on account of dispute with regard to keeping of cow

                   dung, the petitioner and other accused persons variously armed

                   with the lathi and danda started abusing and assaulting, causing

                   head injury. It is further alleged that when the son and daughter

                   intervened to save their father, the co-accused, namely, Chandan

                   Kumar assaulted the informant's son by means of rod, causing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77876 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026
                                            2/4




          head injury and even her daughter, namely, Anjali Kumari

          sustained injury.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the

          allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the husband of

          the informant by means of rod, resulting in fracture of his right

          finger. He further submits that even if the said injury is taken

          into account, the same is found not on a vital part of the body

          and cannot be said to be fatal. It is further submitted that the

          petitioner is a Panchayat Teacher and only to settle personal

          scores, his name is given in present case, however, no such

          incident as alleged has occurred. It is lastly been submitted that

          the petitioner has clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for anticipatory bail.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid submission, facts and

          circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be

          released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender

          before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks

          from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten

          thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77876 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026
                                            3/4




          pending/successor court in connection with Makhdumpur P.S.

          Case No. 580 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down

          under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read

          with corresponding Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. as well as

          subject to the following conditions:-

                          (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his

                          close relative.

                          (ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present

                          in the Court on each date of the trial.

                          (iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates, or

                          in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of

                          the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the

                          Court concerned.

                          (iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar

                          nature of offence in future, the prosecution shall be

                          at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

                          (v) The learned Court below shall verify the

                          criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                          any stage it is found that the petitioner has

                          concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below

                          shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the

                          petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77876 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026
                                                       4/4




                                     terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be

                                     delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                                     verification.

                                  7. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is

                     allowed.

                                  8. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made

                     in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.



                                              (Sourendra Pandey, J)
aditya/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.