Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jitendar Kumar @ Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to stringent conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Jitendar Kumar, is in judicial custody for alleged dowry death under IPC Sections 304B and 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleges he poisoned his wife after she could not bear children, leading to her death during transport to Patna. The petitioner filed a second bail application, asserting he has no criminal antecedents, will appear for trial, and will not tamper with witnesses. The State opposed bail, citing his role as husband and the seriousness of the offence. Considering the facts, the court granted bail with a Rs.10,000 bond and multiple conditions to ensure his appearance and prevent witness interference.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to an accused in a dowry death case under IPC 304B/34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act.
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of influencing witnesses or committing further offences if released on bail.
  • Whether imposing strict conditions can sufficiently safeguard the trial process.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry death
  • IPC 304B
  • Section 34
  • Dowry Prohibition Act
  • judicial custody
  • witness tampering
  • criminal trial

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77989 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2024 Thana- Kavaiya District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
                 Jitendar Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Amritesh Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Ms. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   10-04-2026                     Heard Mr. Amritesh Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and the State.

                                2. The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection

                   with Kabaiya P.S. Case No. 5 of 2024 for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the IPC and ¾ of the D.P.

                   Act, lodged on 01.03.2024 by the informant, Vikash Prasar.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged

                   that the marriage of her daughter was solemnized on 16.02.2022

                   but was always tortured for dowry and when they came to know

                   that she cannot become mother, was killed by administering

                   poison which led to the FIR.

                                4. The petitioner is the husband, earlier moved before

                   this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 56540 of 2024 of 2024 which came

                   to be dismissed on 19.11.2024.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77989 of 2025(5) dt.10-04-2026
                                            2/4




                       5. This is the second bail application. A report was

          called for from the learned Trial Court and the report dated

          06.03.2026 shows that charges have been framed and two out of

          six witnesses have been examined.

                       6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          marriage took place in the year 2022 and even after treatment,

          when she came to know that the lady cannot become mother,

          went into depression. She was treated by the husband at

          Lakhisarai and Annexure-P/3 is testimony to it.

                       7. The fact remains that under depression, she

          consumed poison, was immediately taken by the husband-

          petitioner to the local nursing home on 27.02.2024 where she

          was under treatment for two days and later, on 29.02.2024, the

          Doctor asked them to move to Patna for better treatment as the

          condition was not improving.

                       8. While moving on Ambulance from Lakhisarai to

          Patna (details of the Ambulance is also on record), the lady

          breathe her last on way.

                       9. The submission is that he is ready to face the trial,

          is in custody since 11.03.2024 (immediately after the

          occurrence), shall diligently appear in trial and failure to do so,

          the Trial Court can take immediate steps for cancellation of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77989 of 2025(5) dt.10-04-2026
                                            3/4




          bail bond. Further, if granted relief, he shall in no way, indulge

          in any activity to influence the witnesses and again if he does,

          the State will be free to take immediate steps for the

          cancellation of the bail bond.

                       10. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail

          submitting that he is the husband and trial is on.

                       11. Considering the submissions of the parties as also

          the facts that have been recorded, the petitioner do not have

          criminal antecedent and is in custody since 11.03.2024 and an

          undertaking has been given that he shall diligently appear in

          trial and shall in no way, indulge in any activity to influence the

          witnesses, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend

          him the privilege of bail with conditions.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties

          of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and

          Additional Sessions Judge-II, Lakhisarai in connection with

          Kabaiya P.S. Case No. 5 of 2024 subject to the following

          conditions:

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document to show his/her bona fide;
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77989 of 2025(5) dt.10-04-2026
                                                       4/4




                                  (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                     before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

                     dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his

                     bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                  (iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned

                     police station every fortnight for six months to mark his

                     attendance and at the end of the period, the certificate be

                     submitted to the Court;

                                  (iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

                     promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                     failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                     cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                  (v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                     criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                     to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.



                                                    (Rajiv Roy, J)
Vijay Singh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.