Patna High Court
Rahul Kumar RawatversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The Court granted permission to withdraw the application, allowing the petitioner to move a fresh application before the lower court.
Summary
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Rawat, filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application, citing that the impugned order had already been challenged in another proceeding (Cr. Misc. No.9923 of 2025). The learned counsel for the State opposed the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw the application with liberty to file a fresh application before the lower court. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original case were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the pending application and file a fresh one before the lower court
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- permission to withdraw
- criminal miscellaneous proceedings
- court order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78017 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2024 Thana- CHANDRAMANDI District- Jamui
======================================================
Rahul Kumar Rawat Son of Ashok Rawat @ Ashok Raw Village -Ghorparan
PS -Laxmipur Distrit -Jamui
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Ankita Kumari, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhuri Lata, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
3 22-01-2026 Heard Ms. Ankita Kumari, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr. Madhuri Lata, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. After some argument, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with
liberty to move a fresh application before the learned Court
below as the impugned order has already been assailed in Cr.
Misc. No.9923 of 2025.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-
U T
Checking your session…