Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jyoti Kumari @ Lovely Kumari @ LovelyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions, under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Jyoti Kumari, applied for bail in a theft case (Patliputra P.S. Case No. 587 of 2024) involving alleged robbery of gold, silver ornaments and cash. The FIR names unknown persons; the petitioner asserts she is not named, not shown in CCTV footage, and no stolen items have been recovered from her. She disclosed nine prior criminal cases, eight of which resulted in bail and one pending before the court. The State opposed bail, but the court, considering the lack of direct evidence linking her to the crime, granted bail subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023, requiring a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and compliance with further stipulations. The order directs her to surrender within eight weeks if arrested, and provides for cancellation of bail if undisclosed antecedents are later discovered.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a theft case under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of the B.N.S. given the absence of direct evidence against her.
  • Whether the court can impose bail conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 in the present circumstances.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • theft
  • criminal antecedents
  • Section 482
  • preliminary investigation
  • cautionary conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78110 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-587 Year-2024 Thana- PATLIPUTRA District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Jyoti Kumari @ Lovely Kumari @ Lovely W/o Ravi Kumar, Resident of
                 Sakin- East Nand-Gola, P.S.- Malsalami, Patna City, District- Patna

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Sarvottam Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   26-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending her arrest,

                   in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 587 of 2024, dated

                   28.12.2024, registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of B.N.S.

                                 3. The present F.I.R. has been lodged against

                   unknown persons regarding theft of golden and silver ornaments

                   besides cash and foreign currency, some clothes and house hold

                   items. As per the prosecution case, the informant was away from

                   his house and during his absence, theft was committed by

                   unknown persons and further claim in the F.I.R., as per CCTV

                   footage, the occurrence has taken place at 1:00 am on

                   27.12.2024.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78110 of 2025(3) dt.26-02-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

          case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that

          petitioner has not named in the F.I.R., nor she is shown in the

          CCTV footage, nor any recovery has been made from

          possession of the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner

          has nine criminal antecedents, out of which she has already been

          on bail in eight cases and one is pending before this Court for

          consideration.

                       5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail

          petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier

          either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

                       6. However, learned APP for the State vehemently

          opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

                       7. Considering the nature of allegation and the

          material on record, this petition is allowed, directing the

          petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of

          her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of

          eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of

          this order, on her furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.

          10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court Below, in
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78110 of 2025(3) dt.26-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 587 of 2024, subject to

                     the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the

                     B.N.S.S., 2023 and on the following conditions:

                                  (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                     below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent other than

                     the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail

                     bonds of the petitioner after hearing her and getting satisfied

                     that the petitioner has concealed her criminal antecedents

                     despite her knowledge of the same.

                                  (ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                     below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong,

                     learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                  (Jitendra Kumar, J.)
ravishankar/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.