Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gamha SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail is granted to the petitioner on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of appearance.

Summary

Gamha Sharma was arrested in connection with an assault that allegedly led to the death of a person, and was charged under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The FIR contains only general and omnibus allegations and the informant is not an eye‑witness; the post‑mortem report shows death by hanging with no external injuries. Sharma has been in custody since 23 July 2025 and the case is at the prosecution‑evidence stage. The court noted that a similarly situated co‑accused, Yashwant Yadav, had already been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate bench. Considering the lack of direct evidence, the long custodial period, and the precedent of bail to the co‑accused, the court ordered bail for Sharma subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions of appearance. The bail may be cancelled if Sharma fails to appear on two consecutive dates without satisfactory reason.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite charges under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
  • Whether the grant of anticipatory bail to a similarly situated co‑accused influences the bail decision for the petitioner

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • anticipatory bail
  • FIR
  • post‑mortem report
  • co‑accused
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Sections 103
  • Section 3(5) B.N.S.

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78235 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2025 Thana- Nawalpur District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Gamha Sharma S/o Yogindra sharma Resident of Ward No. 9, Nawalpur, P.S.-
                 Nawalpur, District - West Champaran
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Dhananjay Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2
                 For the Informant                 Mr. Umesh Kumar Gupta
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   20-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public

                   Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                3. Petitioner along with other accused persons are said

                   to have assaulted the deceased.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   there are general and omnibus allegations made in the First

                   Information Report and as a matter of fact, the informant is not

                   an eye witness to the occurrence. Further, the postmortem report

                   also indicates that there is no external injury except the ligature

                   mark on the neck and the cause of death has also been stated to

                   be asphyxia due to hanging. It is further submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78235 of 2025(4) dt.20-02-2026
                                            2/3




          considering all the facts and circumstances, similarly situated

          co-accused Yaswant Yadav has been granted privilege of

          anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order

          dated 10.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 70987 of 2025

          Further, the petitioner is in custody since 23.07.2025 and after

          framing of charges, the case is pending at the stage prosecution

          evidence.

                       5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for

          the informant have opposed the application for bail. Learned

          counsel for the informant has fairly submitted that he is not in a

          position to controvert the fact that the case of the petitioner

          would be is on similar footing as that of the co-accused

          Yashwant Yadav.

                           6. Taking into consideration the facts and

          circumstances and also considering the fact that the similarly

          situated co-accused has already been granted bail, let the above

          named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where

          the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nawalpur

          P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025, subject to the conditions that the

          petitioner shall appear on each and every date till conclusion of
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78235 of 2025(4) dt.20-02-2026
                                                         3/3




                       trial and if the petitioner does not appear on two consecutive

                       dates without any substantial and satisfactory reason, the

                       learned court below would be at liberty to cancel his bail bonds.



                                                 (Soni Shrivastava, J)
devendra/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.