Patna High Court
Sanwar Devan @ Sanwar HusenversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
The court denied anticipatory bail to petitioner 1 due to his prior convictions but granted anticipatory bail to petitioners 2 and 3 subject to a bail bond and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
Summary
The petitioners – Sanwar Devan, Mintu Dewan and Mehboob – applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 317(5) and 111 of the B.N.S. and Sections 11(1)(d)(e)(f)(l) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act for alleged cattle smuggling. The petitioners claimed innocence, stating that petitioner 2 had lawfully purchased the calves and hired petitioner 3’s vehicle for transport, and that the police had demanded illegal gratification before filing the case. The State opposed the bail, highlighting that the petitioners were named in the FIR and that petitioner 1 had two prior convictions and petitioner 2 one prior conviction. The High Court, considering the antecedents, rejected anticipatory bail for petitioner 1 but granted it to petitioners 2 and 3, directing them to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties each, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. The application was thereafter disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to each petitioner under the applicable provisions of the B.N.S. and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act
- Whether the criminal antecedents of the petitioners justify denial of anticipatory bail
- Whether Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. can be invoked to impose conditions on the grant of anticipatory bail
Legislation cited
- B.N.S. — s. 111, 317(5)
- B.N.S.S. — s. 482(2)
- Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act — s. 11(1)(d), 11(1)(e), 11(1)(f), 11(1)(l)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- cattle smuggling
- criminal antecedents
- Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act
- Section 482
- bail bond
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7847 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-268 Year-2025 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Gopalganj
======================================================
1. Sanwar Devan @ Sanwar Husen S/O Noorayan Shah @ Nuraian Shah @
Nurayan Dewan R/O Village- Ahirauli Dubauli, Tola Takiya, P.S- Gopalpur,
District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
2. Mintu Dewan @ Mintu Ali @ Mintu S/O Nor Mahammad @ Nur
Muhammad Sah R/O Village- Ahirauli Dubauli, Tola Takiya, P.S- Gopalpur,
District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
3. Mehboob S/O Hamid R/O Village- Ratupur, P.S- Ratupur, Distt.- Sambhal,
Uttar Pradesh.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Indrajeet Bhushan, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 20-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case
registered for the offence punishable under Sections 317(5) and
111 of the B.N.S. and Sections 11(1)(d)(e)(f)(l) of the
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.
3. As per prosecution case, these petitioners are
suspected to be involved in smuggling of cattle.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7847 of 2026(2) dt.20-02-2026
2/3
have committed no offence. Petitioner No. 2 is lawful owner of
the recovered cattle and had purchased the calves from Dhadha
Pashu Mela, Kushinagar, after paying consideration money and
in the night of 12.10.2025, he hired a pickup van bearing
Registration No. UP38AT4076 from Petitioner No. 3 for
transporting the cattle to his village and while transportation, at
Airauli Dubauli, Tola Takiya, the police intercepted the vehicle
and asked for documents of the vehicle and calves and when
everything was found in order, they asked for illegal
gratification and upon refusal, this false and concocted case has
been lodged. Petitioner No. 3 has got no criminal antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has
vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to
the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named in the
F.I.R. with specific accusation that they are involved in
smuggling of cattle. Petitioner No. 1 has got two criminal
antecedents and Petitioner No. 2 has got one criminal
antecedent.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case
and criminal antecedents of Petitioner No. 1, the prayer for grant
of anticipatory bail to Petitioner No. 1 is rejected.
7. So far as Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are concerned,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7847 of 2026(2) dt.20-02-2026
3/3
considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer
for grant of anticipatory bail to Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 is
allowed.
8. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within
a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named
Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-
bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1 st Class,
Gopalganj in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 268 of
2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of
the B.N.S.S..
9. With the aforesaid directions, this application
stands disposed of.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.