Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bambam YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court denied bail, holding that the recovery of a country‑made pistol and the petitioner’s antecedent under the Arms Act preclude the grant of regular bail.

Summary

Bambam Yadav applied for regular bail in a case where the prosecution alleged that a country‑made pistol and 61.69 grams of heroin (smack) were recovered from his possession, along with additional narcotics from a co‑accused. The petitioner contended that no incriminating article or cartridge was found on him and that the seized quantity was below commercial levels, seeking release after being in custody since 1 July 2025. The court considered the seriousness of the alleged offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the NDPS Act, as well as the petitioner’s antecedent under the Arms Act. Weighing these factors, the judge declined to grant bail, noting the presence of an illegal firearm and prior offences. The petitioner was permitted to file a fresh bail application after completing one year in custody or after charges are framed.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Arms Act and NDPS Act given the alleged possession of a country‑made pistol and narcotics.
  • Whether the quantity of narcotic seized, being less than commercial quantity, warrants bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s antecedent under the Arms Act precludes the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • Arms Act
  • NDPS Act
  • narcotics possession
  • illegal firearm
  • antecedent
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78534 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2025 Thana- FALKA District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
                 Bambam Yadav S/O Sukhdev Yadav @ Sukho Yadav Resident of village-
                 Amol (Amoul), P.S.- Falka, District -Katihar

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Ms. Asha Devi, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   11-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Falka P.S. Case no. 79

                   of 2025 registered under section 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita, 2023, section 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act,

                   1959 and section 8(C), 21(b) and 22(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, on a raid being

                   conducted, a country made pistol and 61.69 grams of smack was

                   recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further

                   stated that 19 live cartridges and 41.61 grams of smack was

                   recovered from the possession of the co-accused.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no

                   incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner’s

                   possession. No cartridge was recovered from his possession. The
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78534 of 2025(4) dt.11-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     alleged quantity recovered is less than the commercial quantity. The

                     petitioner is in custody since 1.7.2025 and undertakes to cooperate in

                     the trial.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     taking into consideration the allegation of recovery of a country

                     made pistol and 61.69 grams of smack together with the

                     petitioner having antecedent also under the Arms Act, in the

                     facts of the case, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner

                     on bail and the application is rejected.

                                  7. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his

                     prayer for bail after completing one year in custody or on

                     framing of charge, whichever is later.



                                                 (Partha Sarthy, J)
sauravkrsinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.