Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhupendra Yadav @ Bhupendra Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
REJECTED

Holding

Bail was not granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Bhupendra Yadav was arrested on 20 June 2025 in connection with a case where he was alleged to have attacked his informant's cousin sister with a sharp weapon, resulting in the amputation of her hand and other injuries. The petitioner, claiming a clean record and that the allegations were fabricated, sought bail. The prosecution presented an injury report detailing multiple grievous and simple injuries, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence. The court examined the nature of the injuries, the charges under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, and the lack of any mitigating factor. Considering the gravity of the offences and the evidence of serious injury, the court refused the bail application. Consequently, the petition for bail was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in light of the serious nature of the offences and the grievous injuries inflicted

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • grievous hurt
  • injury report
  • Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78581 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2025 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Bhupendra Yadav @ Bhupendra Kumar Yadav Son of Laxman Yadav R/O
                 Vill.- Sarfafur, P.S.- Udwantnagar, Dist.- Bhojpur

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   29-01-2026                     Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   20.06.2025 in connection with Udwant Nagar P.S. Case No. 310

                   of 2025, F.I.R. dated 19.06.2025 for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 126(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 74 and 3(5) of the

                   BNS, 2023.

                               3. According to prosecution case, the informant's

                   cousin sister was attacked by her brother-in-law who is

                   petitioner in the present case by means of sharp weapon due to

                   which her hand got amputed.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78581 of 2025(4) dt.29-01-2026
                                            2/3




          implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the

          F.I.R is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed

          any offence as alleged in the F.I.R and due to some previous

          dispute the present occurrence has taken place. Although there is

          specific allegation against the petitioner but there is no intention

          to kill anyone.

                      5.    Learned       Additional       Public   Prosecutor   has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and

          submits that the wrist of the injured person has been amputed

          which      is    evident     from       the   injury   report   reproduced

          hereinbelow:-

                             "Injury- (1) Lacerated wound right upper
                             limb 2" above wrist amputed distal part of
                             right hand
                                        (2) sharp cutting wound of sixe
                             3"*2"* muscle deep right parietal region
                                        (3) Lacerated wound of size
                             5"*4"* muscle deep 3" poxime to left wrist
                             joint
                                        (4) Lacerated of size 1"*1/2"*
                             muscle deep on frontal parietal region
                                        (5) Lacerated of size 3"*2"*
                             muscle deep left side upper part of chest
                                        (6) Lacerated 3"*2"* muscle
                             deep right upper part
                             M.I.- Mole on right side face
                             A.I- <1 hours
                             Nature of Injury- Injury no. 1&4 is
                             Grievous
                             Mob- 8987380304 Injury no. 2, 3, 5, 6 is
                             simple"

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78581 of 2025(4) dt.29-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                      with Udwant Nagar P.S. Case No. 310 of 2025 pending in the

                      court of learned CJM, Bhojpur at Ara.

                                   7. Prayer is refused.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Vanisha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.