Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. AlauddinversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Bail was not granted; the application was dismissed.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Alauddin, was arrested in connection with a robbery in which a pistol was used to snatch a golden ring and earring from a woman traveling in a three-wheeler. The prosecution identified him from CCTV footage, and he has been in custody since 24‑10‑2024. He applied for regular bail under Section 309(4) of the BNS, 2023, but the trial has already commenced. The trial court, after hearing counsel, noted the gravity of the offence, the presence of CCTV evidence, and the fact that only one of six witnesses had been examined, and declined to revisit its earlier order denying bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 309(4) of the BNS, 2023 in view of the seriousness of the offence and the stage of trial.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Section 309(4)
  • BNS 2023
  • robbery
  • CCTV evidence
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79237 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1452 Year-2024 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Alauddin S/O Md. Jumerati Miya @ Md. Jumrati Resident of Mohalla-
                 Mewa Saw Lane, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna-800006

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the State          :        Mr.Surendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the

                   petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Phulwarisharif

                   P.S. Case No. 1452 of 2024 registered for the offence under

                   Sections 309(4) of the BNS, 2023.

                                 3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has

                   been rejected vide order dated 19.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc.

                   No. 5467 of 2025, which reads as under:

                                            “Heard the learned counsel for the
                                 petitioner and learned APP for the State.
                                            2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in
                                 connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No.
                                 1452 of 2024 registered for the offence under
                                 Sections 309(4) of the BNS, 2023.
                                            3. As per the prosecution case, the
                                 accused persons on the point of pistol took away
                                 golden ring and earring of the victim while she
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79237 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  was travelling in a three-wheeler in Patna.
                                             4. During investigation, the police
                                  have identified the petitioner from the CCTV
                                  footage as one of the criminals involved in the
                                  loot. Petitioner is in custody since 24.10.2024.
                                             5. Considering the aforesaid facts and
                                  circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to
                                  the petitioner. Accordingly, this application for
                                  regular bail is dismissed.”

                                  4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits out of

                     six witnesses, one witness has been examined.

                                  5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact

                     that the trial has started, I am not inclined to review my earlier

                     order.

                                  6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.