Patna High Court

Vikky Kumar @ Vicky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 9 January 2026
Disposal: DISMISSED
Bench: NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

Holding

The court held that no fresh ground was shown to merit reconsideration of the earlier bail denial, and therefore the bail application was rejected.

Summary

Vikky Kumar applied for regular bail after his earlier bail application was rejected on 13 May 2025. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Digamber Kumar Singh, while the State of Bihar was represented by Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman. The High Court examined whether any fresh ground existed to revisit its earlier order denying bail. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey found that no new material or circumstance was presented that could justify a reconsideration. Consequently, the court upheld its prior decision and rejected the bail application.

Issues considered

Whether there are fresh grounds to reconsider the earlier order rejecting regular bail
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under the circumstances

Subjects

regular bail
bail application
fresh ground
reconsideration
criminal procedure
high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79337 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-547 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Vikky Kumar @ Vicky Kumar S/O Anil Mistri @ Anil Kumar Vishwkarma
                 R/O Village- Goga, P.S.- Mufassil, Dist.- Gaya
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Digamber Kumar Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   09-01-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. Earlier, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner

                   was rejected vide order dated 13.05.2025 passed by this Court in

                   Cr. Misc. No. 17542 of 2025.

                                3. I do not see any fresh ground to reconsider my

                   earlier order dated 13.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 17542 of

                   2025.

                                4. Accordingly, the bail application stands rejected.


                                        (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

Nirmal/-
U      T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…