Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lal Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner with specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Lal Vijay Kumar, was arrested on 22 June 2025 in connection with an FIR dated 7 July 2023 alleging offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to forged documents and fraudulent withdrawal of land‑acquisition funds. The petitioner contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the allegations are fabricated, and that the only incriminating material is a CCTV capture and an alleged signature on a withdrawal slip, which the prosecution has not verified. The State opposed bail, relying on the CCTV footage and the purported signature as evidence of involvement. The Court examined the material, noted the lack of a verified signature and the petitioner's claim of no prior criminal record, and considered the nature of the offences and the risk of tampering with evidence. Consequently, the Court granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions of cooperation, non‑tampering, and verification of antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471/34 of the IPC based on the available evidence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • forgery
  • cheating
  • land acquisition fraud
  • criminal procedure
  • CCTV evidence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79458 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-435 Year-2023 Thana- CIVIL LINE District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Lal Vijay Kumar S/O Ramvilash Yadav R/O Village- Binoba Nagar, P.S.-
                 MMCH, District- Gayaji

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate
                                          :       Ms.Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate
                                          :       Mr. Ritwik Thakur, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   29-01-2026                     Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned A.P.P. for

                   the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   22.06.2025 in connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 435 of

                   2023, F.I.R. dated 07.07.2023 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 409,420,467,468 and 471/34 of IPC.

                                 3. This case has been instituted by Ravindra Ram

                   Bhu-Arjan Officer, Gaya on 07.07.2023. He stated that in his

                   written application that two persons namely Kishore Kumar and

                   Sunita Devi gave an information that their land acquired in

                   AKIC planning but no compensation paid by the government up

                   till now a forged document prepared and all money have been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79458 of 2025(5) dt.29-01-2026
                                            2/4




          withdrawn by the same other persons in conspiracy and forged

          document produce before the bank and before the officer. He

          further stated that Kishore Kumar A/c No.72460100143303 and

          Sunita Devi A/c No. 72460100143362 of South Bihar Gramin

          Bank, DBGB Kujapi Gaya is attached with was signed by Land

          Acquisition Officer, Gaya by both persons have submitted the

          account Number of Bank of Baroda Branch Kothwara, Gaya.

          Further enquiry set-up and found money withdrawn by other

          person in other Bank.

                       4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

          submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. The allegation

          as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner

          has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. Learned

          counsel for the petitioner submits that as per allegation in the

          FIR, the petitioner has withdrawn Rs. Four Lacs from the Bank

          in question in place of Lal Vijay Kumar. Learned counsel for the

          petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has been

          transpired during investigation on the basis of the CCTV

          Footage of the Bank and except the aforesaid, no other cogent

          material has come during investigation against the petitioner to

          suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present

          occurrence. Even the prosecution has not verified the signature
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79458 of 2025(5) dt.29-01-2026
                                            3/4




          of the petitioner and the police, after investigation, submitted

          the chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in

          custody since 22.06.2025.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State, on the other hand, has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and

          submits that the petitioner was found in the CCTV footage of

          the Bank and apart from the aforesaid, the sign of the petitioner

          was found on the withdrawal slip.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner,

          above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-1st, Gaya in

          connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 435 of 2023, with the

          following conditions:-

                       (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

          on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                       (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

          witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

          for cancellation of bail.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79458 of 2025(5) dt.29-01-2026
                                                       4/4




                                  (III) And, further condition that the court below shall

                     verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                     any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                     criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                     cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                     acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                     shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                     verification.



                                            (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.