Patna High Court
Sunita Sharma @ Sunita DeviversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The Court granted permission to withdraw the application and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Sunita Sharma, filed an application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging a refusal of an order. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the application, citing the passage of time and the pending trial court judgment. The Court considered the request and granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court expressly clarified that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the underlying case.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw an application filed under Section 311 CrPC
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 311
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure
- Section 311
- withdrawal of application
- high court order
- dismissal
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7953 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-579 Year-2018 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia
======================================================
Sunita Sharma @ Sunita Devi W/o Binod Sharma R/o Village - Brajesh
Nagar, Ward No. 7, P.S. - K. Hat Purnea, Dist. - Purnea
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mohammad Sufyan
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 16-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. At the very outset, the learned counsel for
petitioners submits that the petitioner has challenged the refusal
of order under Section 311 Cr. P.C. but by the flux of time, the
matter has been posted in trial court for judgment today.
Therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the present
application.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
5. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any
opinion on the merits of the case.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
Jyoti/-
U T
Checking your session…