Patna High Court
Vinod Rai @ Vinod KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
The anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Vinod Rai filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in connection with a criminal case arising from PS Chapra Muffasil, Saran. The petitioner, represented by Ms. Smita Shreeyash, later sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The State of Bihar, represented by APP Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, opposed the withdrawal. The Court examined whether a petitioner may voluntarily withdraw an anticipatory bail petition under the law. Finding no impediment to the petitioner's request, the Court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79605 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2006 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran
======================================================
Vinod Rai @ Vinod Kumar S/o Late Yogendra Rai Permanent R/o Village-
Makhdum Ganj, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran, present address Road
No. 8 C/o Rahul Yadav, Navratanpur Tola, Yadav Bhawan, Ashok Nagar,
Kankarbagh, Patna- 800020
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Kamal Kishor village-Ratalpura, P.S- Chapra, Dist- Saran
3. Sandhaya Kumari C/O-Rahul Yadav, Navratanpur tola, Yadav Bhawan,
Ashok Nagar, Kankarbagh, Patna, 800020
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Ms. Smita Shreeyash, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
4 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this
anticipatory bail application.
3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79605 of 2025(4) dt.22-04-2026
2/2
4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application
stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-
U T
Checking your session…