Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ravi Shankar TiwaryversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner sought permission to withdraw his application after charges were framed, requesting to raise all points at the trial stage. The Court allowed the prayer, dismissing the application as withdrawn, and clarified that it made no comment on the merits of the case. The order is purely procedural.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner’s application for withdrawal can be permitted at this stage?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • procedural order
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79976 of 2024
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2001 Thana- BELA INDUSTRIAL District- Muzaffarpur
                  ======================================================
                  Ravi Shankar Tiwary S/o- Late Shiv Mangal Tiwary Resident of At- Rohua
                  PS-Mushahari District- Muzaffarpur 842002
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                  The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Manoj Kumar Ambastha, Adv
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    28-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    APP for the State.

                                  2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner

                    seeks permission to withdraw this application as during the

                    pendency of this case charges came to be framed and further

                    prays to raise all the points available to him and also the

                    grounds pleaded in this application at the appropriate stage of

                    the trial.

                                  3. Prayer is allowed.

                                  4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

                                  5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed

                    my opinion on the merits of this case.



niku/-                                         (Praveen Kumar, J)

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.