Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court refused to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Petitioner Pawan Kumar, a field officer of Bharat Financial Inclusion Ltd., was implicated in a FIR alleging fraud and misappropriation of Rs. 3,88,819 collected from 18 customers, leading to charges under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, a clean antecedent, and that he never collected any money. The State and the informant opposed the bail, emphasizing the specific accusations of large-scale misappropriation. The court examined the seriousness of the allegations and the risk of the petitioner absconding or tampering with evidence. Considering the nature of the accusation, the court refused the anticipatory bail application.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate decision on the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail under the circumstances of alleged fraud and misappropriation?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • fraud
  • misappropriation
  • IPC 406
  • IPC 420
  • CrPC 438
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80166 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-485 Year-2023 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Pawan Kumar S/O Umesh Sah R/O Vill.- Akurahan Khargi, P.S.- Kanti, Dist.-
                 Muzaffarpur.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Chandan Kumar S/O Rajkumar Mahto R/O Vill.- Ganwara, P.S.- Town,
                 Dist.- Darbhanga.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sanjay Kumar S.K., Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, A.P.P.
                 For the Informant        :      Ms. Nisha, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   13-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant

                   and the State.

                                2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Jay Nagar P. S. Case

                   No. 485 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                3. As per F.I.R., this petitioner, who was working as

                   Field Officer in the Jaynagar Branch of Bharat Financial

                   Inclusion Limited, is alleged to have committed fraud with the

                   company by collecting a sum of Rs. 3,88,819/- from 18

                   members towards loan closure amount but failed to deposit the

                   same in the branch account and thus, misappropriated the said

                   amount.
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80166 of 2025(4) dt.13-03-2026
                                                          2/2




                                     4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                        petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner

                        never collected any amount from the customers and has falsely

                        been implicated in this case. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

                                     5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned

                        counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail

                        application and submitted that there is specific accusation

                        against the petitioner of misappropriating huge amount of

                        money of the company in question.

                                     6. Considering the nature of accusation, prayer for

                        anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.