Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ramasummaprabhari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

Ramasummaprabhari Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous petition in the Patna High Court arising from a 2005 police case. The petition was filed against the State of Bihar and an informant, Pawan Kumar Singh. During the hearing on 19‑02‑2026, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the application and to raise any points later at the charge‑framing stage. The court granted the request to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Subjects

  • petition withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80455 of 2024
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2005 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai
                  ======================================================
                  Ramasummaprabhari Devi Wife of Ramnaresh Singh R/O Vill.- Loshghani,
                  Ward no. 4, P.S.- Surajgarha, (Piri Bazar), Dist.- Lakhisarai, Bihar.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar
            2.    Pawan Kumar Singh Son of Angad Prasad Singh R/O Vill.- Girshauli, P.S.-
                  Sarath, Dist.- Deoghar, Jharkhand (Informant)

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rohit Raj, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Rina Sinha, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    19-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                    learned APP for the State.

                                 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                    petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the

                    present application with liberty to raise all the points available

                    to him at the time of framing of charge.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.



                                               (Sourendra Pandey, J)
krishna/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.