Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mahendra ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, finding no intention to cause death and noting the filing of the charge‑sheet.

Summary

The petitioner, Mahendra Chauhan, was charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 329, 74, 351, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly assaulting an informant and her son after a dispute over a petty issue. The petitioner contended that he is a relative of the informant and that the altercation was a spontaneous fight, resulting only in simple injuries to the informant and a grievous and a simple injury to her son when the son intervened. The State opposed bail, relying on the FIR allegations. The court considered that the injuries to the son were incurred during the intervention, that there was no intention to cause death, and that the charge‑sheet had already been filed after the petitioner had been in custody since 12‑09‑2025. Accordingly, the court ordered the petitioner’s release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious offences alleged in the FIR
  • Whether the circumstances of the assault demonstrate an intention to cause death or grievous harm

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109, 115(2), 126(2), 329, 3(5), 351, 352, 74

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • intent
  • charge-sheet
  • FIR
  • injury

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80499 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2025 Thana- ARIYARI District- Sheikhpura
                 ======================================================
                 Mahendra Chauhan S/o Late Chauthi Chauhan R/o Village - Jodhanbigha, P.S
                 - Ariyari, District - Sheikhpura
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate
                                          :        Mr. Rajnish Kumar, Advocate
                                          :        Ms. Sweta B, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   20-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for

                   the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 329,

                   74, 351, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that the

                   petitioner, along with other co-accused persons, entered the

                   informant’s house and assaulted her and her son.

                                   4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                   that the petitioner is a gotiya of the informant and the First

                   Information Report itself indicates that on a very petty issue of

                   washing at the door of the house, a dispute took place resulting

                   in a free fight between the parties. The F.I.R. also indicates that

                   the verbal altercation was taking place with the informant, but

                   since informant’s son intervened in the matter he was hit owing

                   to which he sustained one grievous injury and another simple.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80499 of 2025(4) dt.20-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      However, the injury of the informant is simple in nature. The

                      petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2025 and charge-sheet has

                      been submitted and in the facts of the case no intention to cause

                      death of the informant or her son can be imputed.

                                      5. Learned APP for the State opposed the grant of

                      bail on the ground of allegations made in the First Information

                      Report.

                                     6. Taking into consideration the facts and

                      circumstances and considering the fact that the informant’s son

                      received injuries only at a time when he intervened in an

                      altercation between the informant and petitioner on very petty

                      issue, coupled with the fact that the charge-sheet has been

                      submitted and the petitioner has remained in custody since

                      12.09.2025, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail

                      on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

                      with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                      the learned A.C.J.M.-II, Sheikhpura/concerned Court below in

                      connection with Ariyari P.S. Case No. 15 of 2025.



                                                (Soni Shrivastava, J)
anand/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.