Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pappu MandalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Pappu Mandal, who was not named in the FIR, was arrested on 20 August 2025 in connection with a case involving alleged murder of an informant's husband and several other offences under the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the informant was not an eye‑witness, the allegations were based on hearsay, and the death of the husband was due to other causes. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges, including murder under Section 304 IPC. The court noted that the charge‑sheet had already been filed, the investigation was complete, and there was no risk of evidence tampering. Consequently, the court granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 437(3) of the CrPC.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to an accused not named in the FIR but charged with murder and other offences under the IPC
  • Whether the lack of an eye‑witness and the alleged hearsay nature of the evidence justify bail
  • Whether the filing of a charge‑sheet and completion of investigation preclude the possibility of evidence tampering

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • hearsay
  • charge-sheet
  • investigation
  • surety

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80767 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1012 Year-2021 Thana- BANKA District- Banka
                 ======================================================
                 Pappu Mandal Son of Late Sannu Mandal Resident of Village- Bishahra, P.S.
                 and District- Banka
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Saurabh Raj, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mrs. Suman Kumari Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-02-2026                   Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Banka

                   P.S. Case No. 1012 of 2021 registered for the offence under

                   Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 379, 307/34 of the Indian Penal

                   Code.

                                3. The accused/petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and

                   is in custody since 20.08.2025.

                                4. The allegation against this petitioner is to commit

                   murder of the husband of informant along with other co-accused

                   persons/family members by causing bodily injuries using iron rod,

                   pipe etc., where injured husband of the informant died after 24

                   days of the occurrence and subsequently Section 304 of the Indian

                   Penal Code was added in the formal F.I.R., where occurrence

                   arises out of previous enmities due to local disputes and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80767 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026
                                            2/3




          differences.

                       5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

          submitted that it appears from the face of F.I.R. that informant is

          not the eye witness of the occurrence and raised allegation based

          upon suspicion and hearsay input, as received from unknown

          villagers. It is submitted that the present implication is out of

          previous enmities, when husband of informant received injuries

          out of accident. It is further submitted that after treatment the

          husband of informant returned his home and died thereafter,

          certainly for other reasons, not the injuries as alleged to be

          received during occurrence. While concluding the argument, it has

          been submitted that after investigation charge-sheet has been

          submitted under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code and

          moreover, investigation of this case is completed, and as such,

          there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

                       6. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

                       7. Considering         the   facts      and   circumstances   as

          mentioned above, and by taking note of the fact as informant is

          not the eye witness of the occurrence, where after investigation

          charge-sheet has been submitted under Section 304 of the Indian

          Penal Code, where petitioner is in custody since 20.08.2025,

          accordingly the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80767 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026
                                                           3/3




                         on bail in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 1012 of 2021 on

                         furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with

                         two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                         Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka/concerned Court, subject to the

                         conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C.


                                                                   (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
S.Tripathi/-
U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.