Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Navin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Navin Kumar, sought bail in a case registered as Bhadaur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2022, alleging offences under Sections 406, 409, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged misappropriation of funds under the Nal Jal Yojana. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the charge sheet primarily targeted co‑accused Rajnandan Mahto, and that a similar bail was already granted to the co‑accused in Cr. Misc. No. 76530 of 2024. The petitioner also highlighted his clean criminal record and that he had been in judicial custody since 10 September 2025. The State opposed the bail application. After hearing both sides, the Court found the petitioner's arguments persuasive and ordered that he be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case involving alleged criminal breach of trust and cheating under IPC Sections 406, 409, 420 and 34.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal breach of trust
  • cheating
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Patna High Court
  • misappropriation of government funds
  • Nal Jal Yojana

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80825 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2022 Thana- BHADAUR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Navin Kumar S/O Vinod Tanti @ Vinod Prasad R/O Vill.- Jandinagar, P.S.-
                 Bhadaur, Dist.- Patna.
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER
3   21-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with

                   Bhadaur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2022 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal

                   Code.

                                3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he, along

                   with one other, Rajnandan, has misappropriated the government

                   fund and did not complete the work under the Scheme of Nal Jal

                   Yojana.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

                   offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned

                   counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner and

                   other co-accused persons have completed the work in question,
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80825 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026
                                                      2/2




                    they have falsely been implicated in the present case. Police have

                    submitted a charge sheet. He also submits that in para-41 of the

                    case diary, all the allegations are against Rajnandan Mahto. It has

                    also been submitted that similarly situated other co-accused

                    person, namely, Rajnandan Mahto, has already been granted bail

                    by the learned coordinate bench of this court passed in Cr. Misc.

                    No. 76530 of 2024. The case of this petitioner stands on similar

                    footing. He further submits that a statement has been made in para

                    3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he

                    is languishing in judicial custody since 10.09.2025.

                                 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                    for the State.

                                 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                    considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                    inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.          The above named

                    petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                    bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of

                    the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

                    Magistrate, 1st Class, Barh, Patna in connection with Bhadaur P.S.

                    Case No. 53 of 2022.



                                                   (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.