Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

SACHCIDANAND SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that the application was infructuous and permitted its withdrawal.

Summary

The petitioner, Sachcidanand Singh, filed an application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 27-01-2026, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, arguing that it had become infructuous. The court examined the request and found that the application indeed no longer served any purpose. Accordingly, the court granted permission to withdraw the application. The order concludes that the application is dismissed as withdrawn having become infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the application may be withdrawn on the ground that it has become infructuous

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • infructuous application
  • high court order
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81126 of 2019
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2006 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur
                  ======================================================
                  Sachcidanand Singh Son Of Ram Bihari Singh Resident Of Village - 82,
                  Lamezere Lane, Guzari Bazar, Oriental College, Patna City Pojhauganj
                  Ranipur Milki Chak, P.S.- Patna City, Dist.- Patna.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Mohammed Abu Haidar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

4    27-01-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                    learned counsel for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    present application has become infructuous and hence, he seeks

                    permission to withdraw this application.

                                 3. Permission, as prayed, is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn as having become infructuous.



                                               (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.